Safety of olanzapine versus conventional antipsychotics in the treatment of patients with acute schizophrenia.: A naturalistic study

被引:17
作者
Alvarez, E
Bobes, J
Gómez, JC
Sacristán, JA
Cañas, F
Carrasco, JL
Gascón, J
Gibert, J
Gutiérrez, M
机构
[1] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
[3] Lilly Res Labs, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Psiquiatr Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[5] Hosp Fundac Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
[6] Hosp Mutua Tarrasa, Tarrasa, Spain
[7] Univ Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain
[8] Hosp Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain
关键词
schizophrenia; in-patients; olanzapine; antipsychotics; safety; effectiveness;
D O I
10.1016/S0924-977X(02)00079-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Conventional antipsychotics although effective in treating acute psychotic and behavioural symptoms are subject to certain limitations due to the high incidence of side effects associated, mainly extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and insufficient response shown in some cases. EPS are a major factor in neuroleptic non compliance and high relapse rates among patients. This study was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of olanzapine compared to typical antipsychotics drugs in the treatment of schizophrenic inpatients at acute psychiatric in-patient units. Method: Data from 904 patients schizophrenic patients (1720 of ICD10, WHO) were collected in this prospective, comparative, non-randomized, open and observational study. Patients were followed during their entire hospital stay. Safety was assessed through the collection of spontaneous adverse events and a specific extrapyramidal symptoms questionnaire (EPS). Clinical status was measured through the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI) and the Nursing Observational Scale for In-patient Evaluation (NOSIE). Results: A total of 483 patients received olanzapine (olanzapine group, OG), and 421 received typical antipsychotics (control group, CG). Treatment emergent EPS, or worsening of previous EPS were statistically significantly higher in the CG (P = 0.001). Responder rate was statistically greater in the OG (P < 0.001). Mean change in BPRS-total, BPRS-negative, BPRS-agitation subscales and PGI was significantly higher in the OG (P < 0.001). Mean decrease in CGI, BPRS positive and BPRS depression sub-scales was also significantly lower (P less than or equal to 0.05). Mean change in the NOSIE scale was similar between both groups. Conclusion: Olanzapine has been shown to be better tolerated in comparison with conventional antipsychotics in a large unselected sample of acutely psychotic schizophrenic in-patients. Its effectiveness may be greater than that of conventional antipsychotics. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V./ECNP All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 48
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[21]  
WOERNER MG, 1988, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V24, P112