Topological FDR for neuroimaging

被引:340
作者
Chumbley, J. [1 ]
Worsley, K. [2 ]
Flandin, G. [1 ]
Friston, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wellcome Trust Ctr Neuroimaging, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Stat, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; RANDOM-FIELDS; SIGNALS; ACTIVATION; INFERENCE; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.090
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In this technical note, we describe and validate a topological false discovery rate (FDR) procedure for statistical parametric mapping. This procedure is designed to deal with signal that is continuous and has, in principle, unbounded spatial support. We therefore infer on topological features of the signal, such as the existence of local maxima or peaks above some threshold. Using results from random field theory, we assign a p-value to each maximum in an SPM and identify an adaptive threshold that controls false discovery rate, using the Benjamini and Hochberg (BH) procedure (1995). This provides a natural complement to conventional family wise error (FWE) control on local maxima. We use simulations to contrast these procedures; both in terms of their relative number of discoveries and their spatial accuracy (via the distribution of the Euclidian distance between true and discovered activations). We also assessed two other procedures: cluster-wise and voxel-wise FOR procedures. Our results suggest that (a) FDR control of maxima or peaks is more sensitive than FWE control of peaks with minimal cost in terms of false-positives, (b) voxel-wise FDR is substantially less accurate than topological FWE or FDR control. Finally, we present an illustrative application using an fMRI study of visual attention. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3057 / 3064
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
ALDOUS D, 1989, SERIES APPL MATH SCI, V77, P25
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Empirical model-building and response surfaces
[3]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[4]   False discovery rates for spatial signals [J].
Benjamini, Ybav ;
Heller, Ruth .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 102 (480) :1272-1281
[5]   False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields [J].
Chumbley, Justin R. ;
Friston, Karl J. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 44 (01) :62-70
[6]   Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of inference and power [J].
Friston, KJ ;
Holmes, A ;
Poline, JB ;
Price, CJ ;
Frith, CD .
NEUROIMAGE, 1996, 4 (03) :223-235
[7]  
Friston KJ., 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V1, P210, DOI [DOI 10.1002/HBM.460010306, 10.1002/hbm.460010306]
[8]   Cluster-based analysis of FMRI data [J].
Heller, Ruth ;
Stanley, Damian ;
Yekutieli, Daniel ;
Rubin, Nava ;
Benjamini, Yoav .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 33 (02) :599-608
[9]   Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review [J].
Nichols, T ;
Hayasaka, S .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (05) :419-446
[10]   False discovery control for random fields \ [J].
Pacifico, MP ;
Genovese, C ;
Verdinelli, I ;
Wasserman, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 99 (468) :1002-1014