Comparison between transuncal approach and upper vertebral transcorporeal approach for unilateral cervical radiculopathy - A preliminary report

被引:29
作者
Hong, W. J.
Kim, W. K.
Park, C. W.
Lee, S. G.
Yoo, C. J.
Kim, Y. B.
Jho, H. D.
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Gil Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Inchon 405760, South Korea
[2] Drexel Univ, Allegheny Gen Hosp, Sch Med, JHO,Inst Minimally Invas Neurosurg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
anterior microforaminotomy; cervical vertebra; radiculopathy; intervertebral disc;
D O I
10.1055/s-2006-954828
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The surgical treatments for unilateral cervical radiculopathy have been performed by either the anterior or posterior approach. The anterior approach has usually been used more than the posterior approach. The authors compared the results of newly advanced upper vertebral transcorporeal (UVTC) approach with those of the original transuncal (TU) approach in the anterior approach. Methods: The anterior cervical microforaminotomy was performed for 60 patients (male: female = 40:20) from June, 2000 to October, 2003. 40 patients were treated by the TU approach while 20 patients were operated on by the new UVTC approach. The authors analyzed postoperative changes of disc height, the spinal instability, the average length of hospital stay, the degree of patients' satisfaction and complications from each approach. The mean follow-up period was 9.5 months. Results: In the TU approach, postoperative intervertebral disc height was decreased from 7.1 +/- 0.65 mm to 6.2 +/- 0.61 mm. In the UVTC approach, postoperative intervertebral disc height was decreased from 6.6 +/- 0.43 mm to 6.3 +/- 0.41 mm. The average length of hospital stay was 5.2 days for the TU approach and 3.4 days for the UVTC approach. In the TU approach, 28 patients experienced excellent results, 11 patients experienced good results, one patient who experienced a fair result was operated by anterior cervical fusion because of a recurrent herniated disc. In the UVTC approach, 16 patients had excellent results and four patients experienced good results. Conclusions: This comparative study demonstrates that the UVTC approach is a better surgical technique than the TU approach considering the preservation of disc height, spinal stability, length of hospital stay, degree of satisfaction and complications.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 301
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
POSTEROLATERAL MICRODISCECTOMY FOR CERVICAL MONORADICULOPATHY CAUSED BY POSTEROLATERAL SOFT CERVICAL DISK SEQUESTRATION [J].
ALDRICH, F .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1990, 72 (03) :370-377
[2]
Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy: Posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion [J].
Chen, BH ;
Natarajan, RN ;
An, HS ;
Andersson, GBJ .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 2001, 14 (01) :17-20
[3]
Biomechanical effects of progressive anterior cervical decompression [J].
Chen, TY ;
Crawford, NR ;
Sonntag, VKH ;
Dickman, CA .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (01) :6-13
[4]
CHUNG HY, 1981, 7 INT C NEUR SURG MU, P12
[5]
Uncinate processes and Luschka joints influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine: Quantification using a finite element model of the C5-C6 segment [J].
Clausen, JD ;
Goel, VK ;
Traynelis, VC ;
Scifert, J .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1997, 15 (03) :342-347
[6]
A long-term outcome study of 170 surgically treated patients with compressive cervical radiculopathy [J].
Davis, RA .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1996, 46 (06) :523-530
[7]
Failed anterior cervical foraminotomy [J].
Hacker, RJ ;
Miller, CG .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 98 (02) :126-130
[8]
TRANS-UNCO-DISCAL APPROACH - COMBINED ANTERIOR AND LATERAL APPROACH TO CERVICAL DISKS [J].
HAKUBA, A .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1976, 45 (03) :284-291
[9]
JACOBS B, 1970, J AMER MED ASSOC, V211, P2135
[10]
JANG WY, 2001, J KOREAN NEUROSURG S, V30, P600