Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)

被引:117
作者
Angst, F.
Goldhahn, J.
Pap, G.
Mannion, A. F.
Roach, K. E.
Siebertz, D.
Drerup, S.
Schwyzer, H. K.
Simmen, B. R.
机构
[1] Schulthess Klin, Dept Upper Extrem & Hand Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Schulthess Klin, Dept Musculoskeletal Res, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Med Phys, Dept Rheumatol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Phys Therapy, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
关键词
shoulder; questionnaire; reliability; validity; SPADI;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/kel040
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objective. To cross-culturally adapt the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) from English into German, and to test the reliability and validity of the German version. Methods. Cross-cultural adaptation of the SPADI was performed according to international guidelines. One hundred and eighteen patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty, on average 4 yr previously, completed a questionnaire booklet containing the German SPADI, the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire for the shoulder to assess SPADI's construct validity. One week later, they completed the SPADI again to assess test-retest reliability. Results. The six-step cross-cultural adaptation procedure revealed no major problems with the content or language. The intraclass correlation coefficients for the individual items of the SPADI were between 0.68 and 0.89, and that for the SPADI total score was 0.94. The SPADI total score showed a correlation of 0.61-0.69 with the SF-36 physical scales, of 0.88 with the DASH and of 0.92 with the ASES. Conclusions. The German SPADI is a practicable, reliable and valid instrument, and can be recommended for the self-assessment of shoulder pain and function.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
ABRAHAMSON JH, 2001, MAKING SENSE DATA SE, P132
[2]
Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: Usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures [J].
Angst, F ;
Pao, G ;
Mannion, AF ;
Herren, DB ;
Aeschlimann, A ;
Schwyzer, HK ;
Simmen, BR .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2004, 51 (05) :819-828
[3]
ANGST F, 2003, OUTCOME RES, V3, P623
[4]
[Anonymous], FDN CLIN RES APPL PR
[5]
Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires [J].
Beaton, D ;
Richards, RR .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1998, 7 (06) :565-572
[6]
Beaton D E, 2001, J Hand Ther, V14, P128
[7]
Measuring function of the shoulder - A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Richards, RR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (06) :882-890
[8]
Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[9]
Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Bot, SDM ;
Terwee, CB ;
van der Windt, DAWM ;
Bouter, LM ;
Dekker, J ;
de Vet, HCW .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2004, 63 (04) :335-341
[10]
BULLINGER M, SF 36 FRAGEBOGEN GES, P98