Drug provocation tests in patients with a history suggesting an immediate drug hypersensitivity reaction

被引:243
作者
Messaad, D [1 ]
Sahla, H [1 ]
Benahmed, S [1 ]
Godard, P [1 ]
Bousquet, J [1 ]
Demoly, P [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Montpellier, Hop Arnaud Villeneuve, INSERM, U454 IFR3, F-34295 Montpellier, France
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-140-12-200406150-00009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Drug hypersensitivity reactions are common and can be life-threatening. Confirmation of the diagnosis should be rigorous and based on clinical history and a physical examination, possibly followed by skin tests and drug provocation tests. Objective: To describe the outcome of drug provocation tests in evaluating patients with histories suggesting drug allergy. Design: Retrospective analysis of clinic case series. Setting: The department for drug allergy at a university hospital. Patients: 898 consecutive patients with suspected immediate drug allergy referred to the clinic between September 1996 and August 2001. Patients with severe skin reactions and those with positive results on skin tests for beta-lactams were excluded. Intervention: Single-blinded administration of increasing doses of the suspected drug, up to the usual daily dose, under strict hospital surveillance. Results: 1372 drug provocation tests were performed using various drugs, including beta-lactams (30.3%), aspirin (14.5%), other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (11.7%), paracetamol (8.9%), macrolides (7.4%), and quinolones (2.4%). There were 241 (17.6%) positive drug provocation test results. Drug provocation reproduced the same symptoms, albeit milder and of a shorter duration, in the following patients: 13 (5.4%) with a history of anaphylactic shock, 17 (7.0%) with a history of anaphylaxis without shock, 10 (4.1%) with a history of laryngeal edema, 19 (7.9%) with a history of bronchospasm, 160 (66.4%) with a history of urticaria, and 22 (9.1%) with a history of maculopapular eruption. All adverse reactions were completely reversed by prednisolone, H-1-antihistamines, and epinephrine as needed. Limitations: Falsely negative results on drug provocation tests may have occurred because of loss of sensitization, rare cofactors not included in the diagnostic procedure, and tolerance induction during provocation. Conclusions: Drug provocation tests in individuals with suspected drug allergy performed in carefully controlled settings can confirm drug hypersensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1006
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations [J].
Aberer, W ;
Bircher, A ;
Romano, A ;
Blanca, M ;
Campi, P ;
Fernandez, J ;
Brockow, K ;
Pichler, WJ ;
Demoly, P .
ALLERGY, 2003, 58 (09) :854-863
[2]  
Brockow K, 2002, ALLERGY, V57, P45
[3]   Celecoxib in patients with asthma and aspirin intolerance. [J].
Dahlen, B ;
Szczeklik, A ;
Murray, JJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (02) :142-142
[4]   Drug hypersensitivity: questionnaire [J].
Demoly, P ;
Kropf, R ;
Bircher, A ;
Pichler, WJ .
ALLERGY, 1999, 54 (09) :999-1003
[5]   Drug allergy diagnosis work up [J].
Demoly, P ;
Bousquet, J .
ALLERGY, 2002, 57 :37-40
[6]  
DERNOLY P, 2001, CURR OPIN ALLERGY CL, V1, P305
[7]   Clinical assessment of drug-induced disease [J].
Gruchalla, RS .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9240) :1505-1511
[8]   A revised nomenclature for allergy -: An EAACI position statement from the EAACI nomenclature task force [J].
Johansson, SGO ;
Hourihane, JO ;
Bousquet, J ;
Bruijnzeel-Koomen, C ;
Dreborg, S ;
Haahtela, T ;
Kowalski, ML ;
Mygind, N ;
Ring, J ;
van Cauwenberge, P ;
van Hage-Hamsten, M ;
Wüthrich, B .
ALLERGY, 2001, 56 (09) :813-824
[9]   The accuracy of the diagnosis of suspected paracetamol (acetaminophen) hypersensitivity: results of a single-blinded trial [J].
Kvedariene, V ;
Bencherioua, AM ;
Messaad, D ;
Godard, P ;
Bousquet, J ;
Demoly, P .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2002, 32 (09) :1366-1369
[10]   Recent advances in the diagnosis of drug allergy [J].
Primeau, Marie-Noel ;
Adkinson, N. Franklin, Jr. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 1 (04) :337-341