A comparison of In-111-octreotide and Ga-67 scintigraphy in malignant lymphoma

被引:8
作者
Cerulus, G [1 ]
Leonard, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] CLIN PARC LEOPOLD, CTR MED NUCL, B-1040 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006231-199707000-00004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We compared In-111-octreotide and Ga-67 scintigraphy for staging malignant lymphoma. In 11 patients, planar imaging was performed 4 and 24 h after the injection of In-111-octreotide and 48 and 72 h after the administration of Ga-67. Radiological and clinical data were used as the 'gold standard', resulting in the identification of 26 lesions. Twenty-three (88%) of these lesions were detected by Ga-67 and 18 (69%) by In-111 scintigraphy. All 14 supra-diaphragmatic lesions were detected by Ga-67 and 13 by In-111. In the intraabdominal areas, only two of eight known localizations were identified by In-111 scintigraphy, whereas Ga-67 uptake was seen in six of them. In the inguinal regions, both tracers detected three of four lesions. Of the eight lesions of low-grade malignancy, seven were visualized by Ga-67 and five by In-111-octreotide imaging. For the intermediate and high-grade lymphomas, Ga-67 showed a similar detection rate (16/18 lesions), whereas In-111 was only able to detect 13 lesions. We conclude that In-111-octreotide provides less information than Ga-67 scintigraphy and conventional staging modalities. The best results for both tracers were observed above the diaphragm. The Ga-67 results were more reliable for the detection of infradiaphragmatic lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 622
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[11]   LYMPHOMA - PREDICTIVE VALUE OF GA-67 SCINTIGRAPHY AFTER TREATMENT [J].
FRONT, D ;
BENHAIM, S ;
ISRAEL, O ;
EPELBAUM, R ;
HAIM, N ;
EVENSAPIR, E ;
KOLODNY, GM ;
ROBINSON, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (02) :359-363
[12]   MEDICAL USE OF GALLIUM RADIONUCLIDES - BRIEF HISTORY WITH SOME COMMENTS [J].
HAYES, RL .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1978, 8 (03) :183-191
[13]  
HIRUMA K, 1990, IMMUNOLOGY, V71, P480
[14]  
HOFFER P, 1980, J NUCL MED, V21, P282
[15]  
HORN NL, 1976, CANCER, V37, P250, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197601)37:1<250::AID-CNCR2820370134>3.0.CO
[16]  
2-N
[17]  
ISRAEL O, 1988, CANCER, V61, P2439, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19880615)61:12<2439::AID-CNCR2820611208>3.0.CO
[18]  
2-Q
[19]  
Ivancevic V., 1995, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, V36, p199P
[20]  
IVANCEVIC V, 1995, EUR J NUCL MED, V22, P856