Problems with item parceling for confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance

被引:137
作者
Meade, Adam W. [1 ]
Kroustalis, Christina M. [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
measurement invariance; factorial invariance; item parceling; item parcels;
D O I
10.1177/1094428105283384
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Combining items into parcels in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) can improve model estimation and fit. Because adequate model fit is imperative for CFA tests of measurement invariance, parcels have frequently been used. However, the use of parcels as indicators in a CFA model can have serious detrimental effects on tests of measurement invariance. Using simulated data with a known lack of invariance, the authors illustrate how models using parcels as indicator variables erroneously indicate that measurement invariance exists much more often than do models using items as indicators. Moreover, item-by-item tests of measurement invariance were often more informative than were tests of the entire parameter matrices.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 403
页数:35
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   UNIDIMENSIONAL VERSUS DOMAIN REPRESENTATIVE PARCELING OF QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS - AN EMPIRICAL EXAMPLE [J].
KISHTON, JM ;
WIDAMAN, KF .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1994, 54 (03) :757-765
[22]   A Comparison of Approaches to Forming Composite Measures in Structural Equation Models [J].
Landis, Ronald S. ;
Beal, Daniel J. ;
Tesluk, Paul E. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2000, 3 (02) :186-207
[23]   To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits [J].
Little, TD ;
Cunningham, WA ;
Shahar, G ;
Widaman, KF .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :151-173
[24]   Sample size in factor analysis [J].
MacCallum, RC ;
Widaman, KF ;
Zhang, SB ;
Hong, SH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1999, 4 (01) :84-99
[25]   REPRESENTING SOURCES OF ERROR IN THE COMMON-FACTOR MODEL - IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY AND PRACTICE [J].
MACCALLUM, RC ;
TUCKER, LR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 109 (03) :502-511
[27]   Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis [J].
Marsh, HW ;
Hau, KT ;
Balla, JR ;
Grayson, D .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1998, 33 (02) :181-220
[28]   APPLICATION OF CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS TO THE STUDY OF SELF-CONCEPT - 1ST ORDER AND HIGHER-ORDER FACTOR MODELS AND THEIR INVARIANCE ACROSS GROUPS [J].
MARSH, HW ;
HOCEVAR, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1985, 97 (03) :562-582
[30]   A comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invariance [J].
Meade, AW ;
Lautenschlager, GJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2004, 7 (04) :361-388