How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect

被引:305
作者
vandenBos, K [1 ]
Lind, EA [1 ]
Vermunt, R [1 ]
Wilke, HAM [1 ]
机构
[1] DUKE UNIV,FUQUA SCH BUSINESS,DURHAM,NC 27706
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
On the basis of fairness heuristic theory, the authors provide an explanation of the frequently replicated fair process effect (the finding that perceived procedural fairness positively affects how people react to outcomes). The authors argue that, in many situations, people may find it difficult to assess whether their outcome is fair or unfair and satisfying or unsatisfying because they only have information about their own outcome and they do not know the outcomes of others and that, in these situations, people use the fairness of the procedure as a heuristic substitute to assess how to judge their outcome. The results of 2 experiments corroborate the authors' line of reasoning. Findings are discussed in terms of recent developments toward an integration of the procedural and distributive justice domains.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1046
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[41]   VOICE, CONTROL, AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE - INSTRUMENTAL AND NONINSTRUMENTAL CONCERNS IN FAIRNESS JUDGMENTS [J].
LIND, EA ;
KANFER, R ;
EARLEY, PC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 59 (05) :952-959
[42]   INDIVIDUAL AND CORPORATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION - USING PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AS A DECISION HEURISTIC [J].
LIND, EA ;
KULIK, CT ;
AMBROSE, M ;
DEVERAPARK, MV .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1993, 38 (02) :224-251
[43]   APPARENT IMPROPRIETY AND PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS JUDGMENTS [J].
LIND, EA ;
LISSAK, RI .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 21 (01) :19-29
[44]   PROCEDURE AND OUTCOME EFFECTS ON REACTIONS TO ADJUDICATED RESOLUTION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST [J].
LIND, EA ;
KURTZ, S ;
MUSANTE, L ;
WALKER, L ;
THIBAUT, JW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 39 (04) :643-653
[45]  
LIND EA, 1992, 4 INT C SOC ADV SOC
[46]  
Messick D.M., 1983, EQUITY THEORY, P61
[47]  
Rutte C. G., 1995, SOCIAL JUSTICE RES, V8, P239, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02334810
[48]  
Stouffer S.A., 1949, The American Soldier: Adjustment during Army Life. (Studies in Social Psychology in World War II), VVolume 1, P87
[49]   WORKERS EVALUATIONS OF THE ENDS AND THE MEANS - AN EXAMINATION OF 4 MODELS OF DISTRIBUTIVE AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE [J].
SWEENEY, PD ;
MCFARLIN, DB .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1993, 55 (01) :23-40
[50]  
Tyler T., 1996, Social Justice Research, V9, P311, DOI [10.1007/BF02196988, DOI 10.1007/BF02196988]