Are systematic reviews more cost-effective than randomised trials?

被引:20
作者
Glasziou, P [1 ]
Djulbegovic, B
Burls, A
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Dept Primary Hlth Care, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffier Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[3] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68919-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:2057 / 2058
页数:2
相关论文
共 3 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF METAANALYSES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF CLINICAL EXPERTS - TREATMENTS FOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
ANTMAN, EM ;
LAU, J ;
KUPELNICK, B ;
MOSTELLER, F ;
CHALMERS, TC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (02) :240-248
[2]   Effect of a US National Institutes of Health programme of clinical trials on public health and costs [J].
Johnston, SC ;
Rootenberg, JD ;
Katrak, S ;
Smith, WS ;
Elkins, JS .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9519) :1319-1327
[3]   COLLABORATIVE WORLDWIDE OVERVIEWS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS [J].
SANDERCOCK, P .
DOING MORE GOOD THAN HARM: THE EVALUATION OF HEALTH CARE INTERVENTIONS, 1993, 703 :149-155