Calculation of Free-Energy Differences by Confinement Simulations. Application to Peptide Conformers

被引:50
作者
Cecchini, M. [1 ]
Krivov, S. V. [2 ]
Spichty, M. [1 ]
Karplus, M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strasbourg, ISIS, Lab Chim Biophys, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[2] Univ Leeds, Inst Mol & Cellular Biol, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Chem & Chem Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; CONFIGURATIONAL ENTROPY; ALANINE DIPEPTIDE; FORCE-FIELDS; SYSTEMS; MECHANICS; EFFICIENT; PROTEINS; FLUCTUATIONS; PHASES;
D O I
10.1021/jp9020646
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Conformational free-energy differences are key quantities for understanding important phenomena in molecular biology that involve large structural changes of macromolecules. In this paper, all improved version of the confinement approach, which is based oil earlier developments, is used to determine the free energy of individual molecular states by progressively restraining the corresponding molecular structures to pure harmonic basins, whose absolute free energy can be computed by normal-mode analysis. The method is used to calculate the free-energy difference between two conformational states of the alanine dipeptide in vacuo, and of the P-hairpin from protein G with an implicit solvation model. In all cases, the confinement results are in excellent agreement with the ones obtained from converged equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations, which have a much larger computational cost. The systematic and statistical errors of the results are evaluated and the origin of the errors is identified. The sensitivity of the calculated free-energy differences to structure-based definitions of the molecular states is discussed. A variant of the method, which closes the thermodynamic cycle by a quasi-harmonic rather than harmonic analysis, is introduced. The latter is proposed for possible use with explicit solvent simulations.
引用
收藏
页码:9728 / 9740
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PYMOL MOL GRAPHICS S
[2]   Calculation of conformational transitions and barriers in solvated systems: Application to the alanine dipeptide in water [J].
Apostolakis, J ;
Ferrara, P ;
Caflisch, A .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 110 (04) :2099-2108
[3]   Binding free energies and free energy components from molecular dynamics and Poisson-Boltzmann calculations. Application to amino acid recognition by aspartyl-tRNA synthetase [J].
Archontis, G ;
Simonson, T ;
Karplus, M .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 306 (02) :307-327
[4]  
Beveridge D.L., 1989, COMPUTER SIMULATIONS, P1
[5]   The dynamic energy landscape of dihydrofolate reductase catalysis [J].
Boehr, David D. ;
McElheny, Dan ;
Dyson, H. Jane ;
Wright, Peter E. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5793) :1638-1642
[6]   HARMONIC DYNAMICS OF PROTEINS - NORMAL-MODES AND FLUCTUATIONS IN BOVINE PANCREATIC TRYPSIN-INHIBITOR [J].
BROOKS, B ;
KARPLUS, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1983, 80 (21) :6571-6575
[7]   CHARMM - A PROGRAM FOR MACROMOLECULAR ENERGY, MINIMIZATION, AND DYNAMICS CALCULATIONS [J].
BROOKS, BR ;
BRUCCOLERI, RE ;
OLAFSON, BD ;
STATES, DJ ;
SWAMINATHAN, S ;
KARPLUS, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1983, 4 (02) :187-217
[8]   HARMONIC-ANALYSIS OF LARGE SYSTEMS .1. METHODOLOGY [J].
BROOKS, BR ;
JANEZIC, D ;
KARPLUS, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 16 (12) :1522-1542
[9]   NORMAL-MODE ANALYSIS OF PROTEIN DYNAMICS [J].
CASE, DA .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1994, 4 (02) :285-290
[10]   Allostery and cooperativity revisited [J].
Cui, Qiang ;
Karplus, Martin .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (08) :1295-1307