The scientific dimensions of social knowledge and their distant echoes in 20th-century American philosophy of science

被引:30
作者
Mirowski, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
来源
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE | 2004年 / 35A卷 / 02期
关键词
social dimensions of science; logical positivism; democracy; context of discovery/justification; goals of science;
D O I
10.1016/j.shpsa.2003.11.002
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
The widespread impression that recent philosophy of science has pioneered exploration of the "social dimensions of scientific knowledge" is shown to be in error, partly due to a lack of appreciation of historical precedent, and partly due to a misunderstanding of how the social sciences and philosophy have been intertwined over the last century. This paper argues that the referents of "democracy" are an important key in the American context, and that orthodoxies in the philosophy of science tend to be molded by the actual regimes of science organization within which they are embedded. These theses are illustrated by consideration of three representative philosophers of science: John Dewey, Hans Reichenbach, and Philip Kitcher. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 326
页数:44
相关论文
共 111 条
[41]  
FULLER S, 2002, PHILOSOPHY SOCIAL SC, V32, P51
[42]  
FULLER S, 2000, T KUHN PHILOSOPHICAL
[43]  
Fuller S., 2002, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
[44]  
Fuller Steve., 1988, SOC EPISTEMOL
[45]  
Giere Ronald N., 1996, GIERE RICHARDSON 199, P335
[46]  
Goldstein W.M., 1997, Research on judgment and decision making: Currents, connections, and controversies, P566
[47]   Richard Rorty's pragmatism: A case study in the sociology of ideas [J].
Gross, N .
THEORY AND SOCIETY, 2003, 32 (01) :93-148
[48]  
Hahn L. E., 1989, PHILOS J DEWEY, P157
[49]  
Hardcastle G, 2003, MINN STUD PHILOS SCI, V18, P1
[50]  
HOLLINGER D, 1996, SCI JEWS CULTURE