Temporal dynamics of saccadic distraction

被引:34
作者
Bompas, Aline [1 ]
Sumner, Petroc [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff CF10 3AT, S Glam, Wales
来源
JOURNAL OF VISION | 2009年 / 9卷 / 09期
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
eye movements; contrast; remote distractor effect; motor planning; competition; race model; COMPETITIVE INTEGRATION; SUPERIOR COLLICULUS; FIXATION-OFFSET; CONTRAST; LATENCY; SIGNALS; MODEL; ATTENTION; CAPTURE; TARGET;
D O I
10.1167/9.9.17
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
The saccadic distractor effect, in which irrelevant stimuli delay saccades to target stimuli, is a popular tool for investigating saccadic competition. Here, we outline the main components of a competition framework to account for the temporal dynamics of the distractor effect, inspired by race models of saccade generation. We. first test a key prediction of this framework: the degree of interference should depend upon the degree of temporal overlap of target and distractor signals in the competition stage, which will vary systematically with the relative processing speeds of the competing visual signals. In agreement with this, we found that, when varying the contrast of distractor stimuli, the presentation delay between target and distractor that maximizes interference varies systematically for different target-distractor pairs, correlated with the difference in saccadic latency for the pair. Second, our data illustrate a crucial methodological point: when comparing the effect of different distractors, measuring at only one time-point ( e. g. simultaneity, as most studies have done) can produce misleading and contradictory results. Thus, it is essential to take the temporal dynamics of the system into account. Lastly, the framework predicts that the optimal delay for the latency distractor effect is different from that maximizing error rate, and our data confirms this.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Eye Movements: Cognition and Visual Perception
[2]   Stimulus intensity modifies saccadic reaction time and visual response latency in the superior colliculus [J].
Bell, A. H. ;
Meredith, M. A. ;
Van Opstal, A. J. ;
Munoz, D. P. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (01) :53-59
[3]   A comparison of bilateral versus unilateral target and distractor presentation in the remote distractor paradigm [J].
Benson, Valerie .
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 55 (05) :334-341
[4]   Sensory sluggishness dissociates saccadic, manual, and perceptual responses: An S-cone study [J].
Bompas, Aline ;
Sumner, Petroc .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2008, 8 (08)
[5]   Oculomotor Distraction by Signals Invisible to the Retinotectal and Magnocellular Pathways [J].
Bompas, Aline ;
Sumner, Petroc .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 102 (04) :2387-2395
[6]   Influence of target and distractor contrast on the remote distractor effect [J].
Born, Sabine ;
Kerzel, Dirk .
VISION RESEARCH, 2008, 48 (28) :2805-2816
[7]   A ballistic model of choice response time [J].
Brown, S ;
Heathcote, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 112 (01) :117-128
[8]   NEURAL COMPUTATION OF LOG LIKELIHOOD IN CONTROL OF SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
CARPENTER, RHS ;
WILLIAMS, MLL .
NATURE, 1995, 377 (6544) :59-62
[9]   Contrast, probability, and saccadic latency: Evidence for independence of detection and decision [J].
Carpenter, RHS .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (17) :1576-1580
[10]  
Carrasco M, 2006, PROG BRAIN RES, V154, P33