Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial

被引:182
作者
Hawe, P
Shiell, A
Riley, T
Gold, L
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Ctr Study Mothers & Childrens Hlth, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jech.2003.014415
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Insignificant or modest findings in intervention trials may be attributable to poorly designed or theorised interventions, poorly implemented interventions, or inadequate evaluation methods. The pre-existing context may also account for the effects observed. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods is outlined that will permit the determination of how context level factors might modify intervention effectiveness, within a cluster randomised community intervention trial to promote the health of mothers with new babies. The methods include written and oral narratives, key informant interviews, impact logs, and inter-organisational network analyses. Context level factors, which may affect intervention uptake, success, and sustainability are the density of interorganisational ties within communities at the start of the intervention, the centrality of the primary care agencies expected to take a lead with the intervention, the extent of context-level adaptation of the intervention, and the amount of local resources contributed by the participating agencies. Investigation of how intervention effects are modified by context is a new methodological frontier in community intervention trial research.
引用
收藏
页码:788 / 793
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Evaluating Health Promotion
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
[3]  
Bradley F, 1999, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V318, P711
[4]   Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health [J].
Campbell, M ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Haines, A ;
Kinmonth, AL ;
Sandercock, P ;
Spiegelhalter, D ;
Tyrer, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7262) :694-696
[5]  
Cash P, 1997, Nurs Inq, V4, P246, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1800.1997.tb00110.x
[6]  
DEHAES WFM, 2002, TSG, V80, P425
[7]   SAMPLE-SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRATIFIED CLUSTER RANDOMIZATION DESIGNS [J].
DONNER, A .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (06) :743-750
[8]   FIXED LIST VERSUS SNOWBALL SELECTION OF SOCIAL NETWORKS [J].
DOREIAN, P ;
WOODARD, KL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) :216-233
[9]  
Durlak J., 1998, Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, V17, P5, DOI DOI 10.1300/J005V17N02_02
[10]   Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies [J].
Eccles, M ;
Grimshaw, J ;
Campbell, M ;
Ramsay, C .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (01) :47-52