Sustainable small-scale CHP technologies for buildings: the basis for multi-perspective decision-making

被引:154
作者
Alanne, K [1 ]
Saari, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Lab Construct Econ & Management, Espoo 02015, Finland
关键词
distributed energy systems; buildings; decision-making; interest groups;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Generally speaking, the concept "small-scale CHP" (combined heat and power) means combined heat and power generation systems with electrical power less than 200 M. The significant benefit of CHP is its overall efficiency, which can be as much as 85-90%. One of the most promising targets in the application of CHP lies in energy production for buildings. The most important competing technologies in this regard are reciprocating engines, microturbines, Stirling engines, and fuel cells. The benefit of these technologies is their ability to utilize sustainable fuels, like regenerative biomass, which makes them attractive. In spite of many technical and economic obstacles limiting the availability and feasibility of these technologies at the moment, the literature is optimistic about their future. The breakthrough of new technology is often regarded simply as a matter of decision-making. This article is a general review of issues that can be supposed to influence decisions when considering small-scale CHP as an alternative energy source for buildings. Firstly, a brief review is presented concerning the political, economic, social, and technological environment of small-scale energy production. Obstacles limiting the market potential of the new technologies are then listed, and solutions are suggested to improve their potential in Europe's liberalizing energy market. The relevant interest groups influencing decisions both for and against the introduction of the new technologies, as well as their status are recognized. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of relevant small-scale CHP technologies are briefly discussed, with respect to building energy generation. Finland's role in this study is emphasized, but the international perspective is also dealt with. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 431
页数:31
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [31] Multicriteria analysis vs. externalities assessment for the comparative evaluation of electricity generation systems
    Mirasgedis, S
    Diakoulaki, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 102 (02) : 364 - 379
  • [32] Some ecological and socio-economic considerations for biomass energy crop production
    Paine, LK
    Peterson, TL
    Undersander, DJ
    Rineer, KC
    Bartelt, GA
    Temple, SA
    Sample, DW
    Klemme, RM
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1996, 10 (04) : 231 - 242
  • [33] Biomass energy surveying and techno-economic assessment of suitable CHP system installations
    Papadopoulos, DP
    Katsigiannis, PA
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2002, 22 (02) : 105 - 124
  • [34] *PRESTIGE ACC, 2002, PRESTIGE ACC WHAT IS
  • [35] Integrated computational life-cycle assessment of buildings
    Ries, R
    Mahdavi, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2001, 15 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [36] RIIHIMAKI M, 2001, WILLINGNESS BUILDER
  • [37] Rosenfeld Y., 1999, Automation in Construction, V8, P503, DOI 10.1016/S0926-5805(98)00097-1
  • [38] Skikos G. D., 1995, Wind Engineering, V19, P371
  • [39] Multi-criteria assessment of building performance, theory and implementation
    Soebarto, VI
    Williamson, TJ
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 36 (06) : 681 - 690
  • [40] Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs): a review of an environmentally clean and efficient source of energy
    Stambouli, AB
    Traversa, E
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2002, 6 (05) : 433 - 455