The Strengths of r- and K-Selection Shape Diversity-Disturbance Relationships

被引:24
作者
Bohn, Kristin [1 ,2 ]
Pavlick, Ryan [1 ]
Reu, Bjoern [1 ,3 ]
Kleidon, Axel [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, Biospher Theory & Modelling Grp, D-07745 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Jena, Jena, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Dept Special Bot & Funct Biodivers Res, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 04期
关键词
TROPICAL RAIN-FORESTS; SPECIES RICHNESS; SEED-SIZE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; TRADE-OFFS; COMPETITION; BIODIVERSITY; MECHANISMS; HYPOTHESIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0095659
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Disturbance is a key factor shaping species abundance and diversity in plant communities. Here, we use a mechanistic model of vegetation diversity to show that different strengths of r- and K-selection result in different disturbance-diversity relationships. r- and K-selection constrain the range of viable species through the colonization-competition tradeoff, with strong r- selection favoring colonizers and strong K-selection favoring competitors, but the level of disturbance also affects the success of species. This interplay among r- and K-selection and disturbance results in different shapes of disturbance-diversity relationships, with little variation of diversity with no r- and no K-selection, a decrease in diversity with r- selection with disturbance rate, an increase in diversity with K-selection, and a peak at intermediate values with strong r- and K-selection. We conclude that different disturbance-diversity relationships found in observations may reflect different intensities of r- and K-selection within communities, which should be inferable from broader observations of community composition and their ecophysiological trait ranges.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]  
Hubbell Stephen P., 2001, V32, pi
[12]   Reciprocal relationships and potential feedbacks between biodiversity and disturbance [J].
Hughes, A. Randall ;
Byrnes, Jarrett E. ;
Kimbro, David L. ;
Stachowicz, John J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 10 (09) :849-864
[13]  
Huston M. A., 1994, BIOL DIVERSITY COEXI
[14]   Testing the intermediate disturbance hypothesis: when will there be two peaks of diversity? [J].
Johst, K ;
Huth, A .
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2005, 11 (01) :111-120
[15]   Effects of productivity and disturbance on species richness: A neutral model [J].
Kadmon, Ronen ;
Benjamini, Yuval .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2006, 167 (06) :939-946
[16]   A global distribution of biodiversity inferred from climatic constraints: results from a process-based modelling study [J].
Kleidon, A ;
Mooney, HA .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2000, 6 (05) :507-523
[17]   Simulated geographic variations of plant species richness, evenness and abundance using climatic constraints on plant functional diversity [J].
Kleidon, Axel ;
Adams, Jonathan ;
Pavlick, Ryan ;
Reu, Bjoern .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 4 (01)
[18]   Unifying the relationships of species richness to productivity and disturbance [J].
Kondoh, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 268 (1464) :269-271
[19]  
MAC ARTHUR ROBERT H., 1967
[20]  
Mackey RL, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P3479, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3479:TDDRII]2.0.CO