Genetic Recombination and Molecular Evolution

被引:70
作者
Charlesworth, B. [1 ]
Betancourt, A. J. [1 ]
Kaiser, V. B. [1 ]
Gordo, I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Evolutionary Biol, Sch Biol Sci, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Inst Gulbenkian Ciencias, P-2780156 Oeiras, Portugal
来源
EVOLUTION: THE MOLECULAR LANDSCAPE | 2009年 / 74卷
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
HILL-ROBERTSON INTERFERENCE; ADAPTIVE PROTEIN EVOLUTION; DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER; DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS; BACKGROUND SELECTION; 4TH CHROMOSOME; Y-CHROMOSOME; NUCLEOTIDE VARIATION; POSITIVE SELECTION; NATURAL-SELECTION;
D O I
10.1101/sqb.2009.74.015
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Reduced rates of genetic recombination are often associated with reduced genetic variability and levels of adaptation. Several different evolutionary processes, collectively known as Hill-Robertson (HR) effects, have been proposed as causes of these correlates of recombination. Here, we use DNA sequence polymorphism and divergence data from the noncrossing over dot chromosome of Drosophila to discriminate between two of the major forms of HR effects: selective sweeps and background selection. This chromosome shows reduced levels of silent variability and reduced effectiveness of selection. We show that neither model fits the data on variability. We propose that, in large genomic regions with restricted recombination, HR effects among nonsynonymous mutations undermine the effective strength of selection, so that their background selection effects are weakened. This modified model fits the data on variability and also explains why variability in very large nonrecombining genomes is not completely wiped out. We also show that HR effects of this type can produce an individual selection advantage to recombination, as well as greatly reduce the mean fitness of nonrecombining genomes and genomic regions.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 186
页数:10
相关论文
共 87 条
[71]   AN EXAMINATION OF THE ROLE OF CHIASMA FREQUENCY IN THE GENETIC SYSTEM OF MARSUPIALS [J].
SHARP, PJ ;
HAYMAN, DL .
HEREDITY, 1988, 60 :77-85
[72]  
Sheldahl LA, 2003, GENETICS, V165, P1195
[73]  
SHERMAN JD, 1995, GENETICS, V141, P683
[74]  
SIMONSEN KL, 1995, GENETICS, V141, P413
[75]  
Smith JM, 2007, GENET RES, V89, P391, DOI [10.1017/S0016672308009579, 10.1017/S0016672300014634]
[76]   Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila [J].
Smith, NGC ;
Eyre-Walker, A .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6875) :1022-1024
[77]   MOLECULAR GENETIC-VARIATION IN THE CENTROMERIC REGION OF THE X-CHROMOSOME IN 3 DROSOPHILA-ANANASSAE POPULATIONS .1. CONTRASTS BETWEEN THE VERMILION AND FORKED LOCI [J].
STEPHAN, W ;
LANGLEY, CH .
GENETICS, 1989, 121 (01) :89-99
[78]  
STEPHAN W, 1995, MOL BIOL EVOL, V12, P959
[79]   DNA evolution under weak selection [J].
Tachida, H .
GENE, 2000, 261 (01) :3-9
[80]  
TAJIMA F, 1989, GENETICS, V123, P585