Experimental Philosophy and the Theory of Reference

被引:88
作者
Deutsch, Max [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Philosophy, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
INTENTIONAL ACTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01370.x
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
It is argued on a variety of grounds that recent results in 'experimental philosophy of language', which appear to show that there are significant cross-cultural differences in intuitions about the reference of proper names, do not pose a threat to a more traditional mode of philosophizing about reference. Some of these same grounds justify a complaint about experimental philosophy as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 466
页数:22
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Intentional action in ordinary language: core concept or pragmatic understanding? [J].
Adams, F ;
Steadman, A .
ANALYSIS, 2004, 64 (02) :173-181
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, NAMING NECESSITY
[3]  
Bach K., 2002, Meaning and Truth, P21
[4]  
Bealer George., 1999, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V13, P29
[5]  
Evans G., 1973, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, V47, P187, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/47.1.187, DOI 10.1093/ARISTOTELIANSUPP/47.1.187]
[6]  
Goldman Alvin, 1998, RETHINKING INTUITION
[7]  
Grice H. P., STUDIES WAY WORDS
[8]   Theory of mind and moral cognition: exploring the connections [J].
Knobe, J .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (08) :357-359
[9]   Intentional action in folk psychology: an experimental investigation [J].
Knobe, J .
PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 16 (02) :309-324
[10]   Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language [J].
Knobe, J .
ANALYSIS, 2003, 63 (03) :190-194