Global patterns of geographic range size in birds

被引:204
作者
Orme, C. David L.
Davies, Richard G.
Olson, Valerie A.
Thomas, Gavin H.
Ding, Tzung-Su
Rasmussen, Pamela C.
Ridgely, Robert S.
Stattersfield, Ali J.
Bennett, Peter M.
Owens, Ian P. F.
Blackburn, Tim M.
Gaston, Kevin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Div Biol, Ascot, Berks, England
[3] Zool Soc London, Inst Zool, London NW1 4RY, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Sch Biosci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ, Sch Forestry & Resource Conservat, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[6] Michigan State Univ Museum, E Lansing, MI USA
[7] Dept Zool, E Lansing, MI USA
[8] Acad Nat Sci, Philadelphia, PA USA
[9] BirdLife Int, Cambridge, England
[10] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, NERC Ctr Populat Biol, Ascot, Berks, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pbio.0040208
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Large-scale patterns of spatial variation in species geographic range size are central to many fundamental questions in macroecology and conservation biology. However, the global nature of these patterns has remained contentious, since previous studies have been geographically restricted and/or based on small taxonomic groups. Here, using a database on the breeding distributions of birds, we report the first ( to our knowledge) global maps of variation in species range sizes for an entire taxonomic class. We show that range area does not follow a simple latitudinal pattern. Instead, the smallest range areas are attained on islands, in mountainous areas, and largely in the southern hemisphere. In contrast, bird species richness peaks around the equator, and towards higher latitudes. Despite these profoundly different latitudinal patterns, spatially explicit models reveal a weak tendency for areas with high species richness to house species with significantly smaller median range area. Taken together, these results show that for birds many spatial patterns in range size described in geographically restricted analyses do not reflect global rules. It remains to be discovered whether global patterns in geographic range size are best interpreted in terms of geographical variation in species assemblage packing, or in the rates of speciation, extinction, and dispersal that ultimately underlie biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:1276 / 1283
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
[31]   Latitudinal gradients in diversity: real patterns and random models [J].
Koleff, P ;
Gaston, KJ .
ECOGRAPHY, 2001, 24 (03) :341-351
[32]   VARIATION IN GEOGRAPHICAL RANGE SIZE AMONG MAMMALS OF THE PALEARCTIC [J].
LETCHER, AJ ;
HARVEY, PH .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1994, 144 (01) :30-42
[33]  
Littell RC., 1996, SAS SYSTEM MIXED MOD
[34]  
Lutz F. E., 1921, American Museum Novitates, VNo. 5, P1
[35]   Species range size distributions for some marine taxa in the Atlantic Ocean. Effect of latitude and depth [J].
Macpherson, E .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2003, 80 (03) :437-455
[36]   North American desert rodents: A test of the mid-domain effect in species richness [J].
McCain, CM .
JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2003, 84 (03) :967-980
[37]   Causes of latitudinal gradients in species richness: A test with fishes of the Tropical Eastern Pacific [J].
Mora, C ;
Robertson, DR .
ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (07) :1771-1782
[38]   Rapoport's rule: A comparative analysis between South and North American columnar cacti [J].
Mourelle, C ;
Ezcurra, E .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1997, 150 (01) :131-142
[39]  
Nelson JB, 1979, SEABIRDS THEIR BIOL, P93
[40]  
Olson DM, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P933, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO