Using Icon Arrays to Communicate Medical Risks: Overcoming Low Numeracy

被引:275
作者
Galesic, Mirta [1 ]
Garcia-Retamero, Rocio [2 ]
Gigerenzer, Gerd [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Dev & Educ, Ctr Adapt Behav & Cognit, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Granada, Dept Expt Psychol, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[3] Max Planck Inst Human Dev & Educ, Harding Ctr Risk Literacy, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
icon arrays; risk communication; older population; numeracy skills; GRAPHICAL DISPLAYS; PROBABILITY; INFORMATION; FREQUENCY; BENEFITS; DECISION; PICTURE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1037/a0014474
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Icon arrays have been suggested as a potentially promising format for communicating risks to patients-especially those with low numeracy skills-but experimental studies are lacking. This study investigates whether icon arrays increase accuracy of understanding medical risks, and whether they affect perceived seriousness of risks and helpfulness of treatments. Design: Two experiments were conducted on samples of older adults (n = 59, 62 to 77 years of age) and university students (n = 112, 26 to 35 years of age). Main Outcome Measures: Accuracy of understanding risk reduction; perceived seriousness of risks; perceived helpfulness of treatments. Results: Icon arrays increased accuracy of both low- and high-numeracy people, even when transparent numerical representations were used. Risks presented via icon arrays were perceived as less serious than those presented numerically. With larger icon arrays (1,000 instead of 100 icons) risks were perceived more serious, and risk reduction larger. Conclusions: Icon arrays are a promising way of communicating medical risks to a wide range of patient groups, including older adults with lower numeracy skills.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 216
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Design features of graphs in health risk communication: A systematic review [J].
Ancker, Jessica S. ;
Senathirajah, Yalini ;
Kukafka, Rita ;
Starren, Justin B. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2006, 13 (06) :608-618
[2]   INFLUENCE OF METHOD OF REPORTING STUDY RESULTS ON DECISION OF PHYSICIANS TO PRESCRIBE DRUGS TO LOWER CHOLESTEROL CONCENTRATION [J].
BUCHER, HC ;
WEINBACHER, M ;
GYR, K .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6957) :761-764
[3]   Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population [J].
Davids, SL ;
Schapira, MM ;
McAuliffe, TL ;
Nattinger, AB .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (04) :310-315
[4]   THE GENERALITY OF THE RATIO-BIAS PHENOMENON [J].
DENESRAJ, V ;
EPSTEIN, S ;
COLE, J .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1995, 21 (10) :1083-1092
[5]   Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures [J].
Edwards, A ;
Elwyn, G ;
Mulley, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7341) :827-830
[6]   Benign breast disease - The risks of communicating risk [J].
Elmore, JG ;
Gigerenzer, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (03) :297-299
[7]   Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: Is a picture worth a thousand statistics? [J].
Fagerlin, A ;
Wang, C ;
Ubel, PA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2005, 25 (04) :398-405
[8]   Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions [J].
Feldman-Stewart, D ;
Kocovski, N ;
McConnell, BA ;
Brundage, MD ;
Mackillop, WJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2000, 20 (02) :228-238
[9]   Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases [J].
Fiedler, K .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2000, 107 (04) :659-676
[10]   ABSOLUTELY RELATIVE - HOW RESEARCH RESULTS ARE SUMMARIZED CAN AFFECT TREATMENT DECISIONS [J].
FORROW, L ;
TAYLOR, WC ;
ARNOLD, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 92 (02) :121-124