Multidetector CT angiography with perfusion analysis in the surveillance of renal artery stents

被引:8
作者
Bucek, RA
Puchner, S
Reiter, M
Dirisamer, A
Minar, E
Lammer, J
机构
[1] Univ Clin Radiol, Dept Angiog & Intervent Radiol, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Clin Internal Med 2, Vienna Gen Hosp, Dept Angiol, Vienna, Austria
关键词
renal artery stenosis; stent; surveillance; restenosis; computed tomographic angiography; multidetector scanner; perfusion analysis;
D O I
10.1583/03-1090.1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate 4 perfusion parameters obtained by multidetector computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in the follow-up of patients after renal artery stenting. \ Methods: Thirty-three consecutive patients (20 women; mean age 64.3+/-10.7 years) with renal artery stents were included in this prospective pilot trial. CTA was performed in 21 patients on a 4-row scanner and in 12 patients on a 16-row scanner. Volume maximum intensity projections and curved planar reconstructions were used for morphological analysis. The initial contrast test bolus was used for perfusion imaging by placing 2 additional regions of interest in the cortex of each kidney. The maximum relative attenuation values (Hounsfield units [HU max]), the time-to-peak values, an attenuation ratio, and a time-to-peak ratio for each side were calculated. Results: Over a mean follow-up of 3.4+/-1.7 years, restenosis was detected in 4 (12.1%) of the 33 stents; in all 66 main renal arteries, 5 (7.5%) significant flow obstructions were detected. Interobserver agreement for all morphological parameters was excellent (kappa>0.8). Mean relative HU max for the cortical region of stented arteries was 63.7+/-29.7 (mean HU ratio 0.37+/-0.12); the mean TTP max was 32.9+/-7.4 seconds (mean ratio 0.76+/-0.10). None of the perfusion parameters differed significantly between patients with and without significant flow obstructions (p>0.05). Conclusions: Despite the excellent morphological information provided by multidetector CTA in the follow-up of renal stents, this modality does not provide hemodynamic information. Unfortunately, none of the evaluated perfusion parameters added any useful information in the follow-up after renal artery stenting.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 143
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Thin-section multidetector CT angiography of renal artery stents [J].
Behar, JV ;
Nelson, RC ;
Zidar, JP ;
DeLong, DM ;
Smith, TP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (05) :1155-1159
[2]   Assessment of renal artery stenosis with CT angiography: Usefulness of multiplanar reformation, quantitative stenosis measurements, and densitometric analysis of renal parenchymal enhancement as adjuncts to MIP film reading [J].
Berg, MH ;
Manninen, HI ;
Vanninen, RL ;
Vainio, PA ;
Soimakallio, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1998, 22 (04) :533-540
[3]   Treatment of ostial renal-artery stenoses with vascular endoprostheses after unsuccessful balloon angioplasty [J].
Blum, U ;
Krumme, B ;
Flugel, P ;
Gabelmann, A ;
Lehnert, T ;
BuitragoTellez, C ;
Schollmeyer, P ;
Langer, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (07) :459-465
[4]   Volume-rendered multidetector CT angiography: Noninvasive follow-up of patients treated with renal artery stents [J].
Mallouhi, A ;
Rieger, M ;
Czermak, B ;
Freund, MC ;
Waldenberger, P ;
Jaschke, WR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 180 (01) :233-239
[5]   Unilateral renal artery stenosis: Perfusion patterns with electron-beam dynamic CT - Preliminary experience [J].
Paul, JF ;
Ugolini, P ;
Sapoval, M ;
Mousseaux, E ;
Gaux, JC .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 (01) :261-265
[6]   Stents for atherosclerotic renovascular disease [J].
Rees, CR .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (06) :689-705
[7]   Renal artery stenosis: Duplex US after angioplasty and stent placement [J].
Sharafuddin, MJA ;
Raboi, CA ;
Abu-Yousef, M ;
Lawton, WJ ;
Gordon, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) :168-173
[8]   Standard dose Gd-DTPA dynamic MR of renal arteries [J].
Tello, R ;
Thomson, KR ;
Witte, D ;
Becker, GJ ;
Tress, BM .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1998, 8 (02) :421-426