Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust

被引:1602
作者
Pavlou, PA
Gefen, D
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Anderson Grad Sch Management, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Drexel Univ, LeBow Coll Business, Management Dept, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
institution-based trust; online auction marketplaces; institutional structures; feedback mechanisms; escrows; third-party guarantees; reputation systems;
D O I
10.1287/isre.1040.0015
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Institution-based trust is a buyer's perception that effective third-party institutional mechanisms are in place to facilitate transaction success. This paper integrates sociological and economic theories about institution-based trust to propose that the perceived effectiveness of three IT-enabled institutional mechanisms-specifically feedback mechanisms, third-party escrow services, and credit card guarantees-engender buyer trust in the community of online auction sellers. Trust in the marketplace intermediary that provides the overarching institutional context also builds buyer's trust in the community of sellers. In addition, buyers' trust in the community of sellers (as a group) facilitates online transactions by reducing perceived risk. Data collected from 274 buyers in Amazon's online auction marketplace provide support for the proposed structural model. Longitudinal data collected a year later show that transaction intentions are correlated with actual and self-reported buyer behavior. The study shows that the perceived effectiveness of institutional mechanisms encompasses both "weak" (market-driven) and "strong" (legally binding) mechanisms. These mechanisms engender trust, not only in a few reputable sellers, but also in the entire community of sellers, which contributes to an effective online marketplace. The results thus help explain why, despite the inherent uncertainty that arises when buyers and sellers are separated in time and in space, online marketplaces are proliferating. Implications for theory are discussed, and suggestions for future research on improving IT-enabled trust-building mechanisms are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 59
页数:23
相关论文
共 85 条
[71]  
SELIS P, 2002, BIDDER BEWARE FRAUD
[72]   PREMIUMS FOR HIGH-QUALITY PRODUCTS AS RETURNS TO REPUTATIONS [J].
SHAPIRO, C .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1983, 98 (04) :659-679
[73]  
SHAPIRO DL, 1992, NEGOTIATION J, V8, P365, DOI 10.1007/BF01000396
[74]   THE SOCIAL-CONTROL OF IMPERSONAL TRUST [J].
SHAPIRO, SP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1987, 93 (03) :623-658
[75]  
SONG J, 2002, P 8 AM C INF SYST DA
[76]   Trust transfer on the World Wide Web [J].
Stewart, KJ .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (01) :5-17
[77]   MEASURING SYSTEM USAGE - IMPLICATIONS FOR IS THEORY TESTING [J].
STRAUB, D ;
LIMAYEM, M ;
KARAHANNAEVARISTO, E .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (08) :1328-1342
[78]  
Tan YH, 2000, INT J ELECTRON COMM, V5, P61
[79]   A Theory of Collective Reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality) [J].
Tirole, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1996, 63 (01) :1-22
[80]   Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior [J].
Whitener, EM ;
Brodt, SE ;
Korsgaard, MA ;
Werner, JM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :513-530