Correction for amino acid loss during acid hydrolysis of a purified protein

被引:68
作者
Darragh, AJ [1 ]
Garrick, DJ [1 ]
Moughan, PJ [1 ]
Hendriks, WH [1 ]
机构
[1] MASSEY UNIV,DEPT ANIM SCI,PALMERSTON NORTH,NEW ZEALAND
关键词
D O I
10.1006/abio.1996.0157
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Hydrolyzing a protein in acid for a single hydrolysis interval, normally 24 h, will lead to inaccurate estimates of the amino acid composition of that protein due to an effect of the time of hydrolysis on peptide bond cleavage and amino acid degradation. The simultaneous yield and decay of amino acids during the hydrolysis of a protein can be described by a compartmental model with parameters for the hydrolysis and loss rates specific to each amino acid in a protein. The amino acid composition of the protein prior to hydrolysis can be determined by nonlinear regression of data derived from multiple hydrolysis intervals. In the present study egg-white lysozyme was hydrolyzed in 6 M HCl using 18 hydrolysis intervals (range, 2-141 h) using the conventional duplicate hydrolyses/interval system. Hydrolysis and loss rates were determined for each amino acid. Increasing the number of hydrolysis intervals prior to the maximum point on the hydrolysis curve, and including an hydrolysis interval greater than 100 h increased the accuracy with which the hydrolysis and loss rates were estimated. Most of the amino acids underwent some degree of loss during hydrolysis, Of particular note was the loss rate for cysteic acid, which was greater than that found for serine which is commonly regarded as an acid-labile amino acid. The determined amino acid composition of the protein, based on the nonlinear regression of the data from four different series of hydrolysis intervals, was compared with the known amino acid composition (sequencing). Using the routine duplicate sampling system, a nonlinear regression including 10 hydrolysis intervals (2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 60, and 141 h) resulted in a mean amino acid recovery of 100% (range, 94-110%) and provided an acceptable compromise between accuracy and the cost of analysis. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 207
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
BLACKBURN S, 1978, AMINO ACID DETERMINA, P1
[2]  
CANFIELD RE, 1963, J BIOL CHEM, V238, P2698
[3]  
Finley J. W., 1985, Digestibility and amino acid availability in cereals and oilseeds, P15
[4]  
GEHRKE CW, 1985, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V68, P811
[5]  
HIRS CHW, 1954, J BIOL CHEM, V211, P941
[6]  
KOHLER GO, 1967, CEREAL CHEM, V44, P512
[7]   STOCHASTIC COMPARTMENTAL ANALYSIS - MODEL AND LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATION FROM TIME SERIES DATA [J].
MATIS, JH ;
HARTLEY, HO .
BIOMETRICS, 1971, 27 (01) :77-&
[8]   ACCURATE METHOD FOR CORRECTING UNKNOWN AMINO-ACID LOSSES FROM PROTEIN HYDROLYZATES [J].
ROBEL, EJ ;
CRANE, AB .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1972, 48 (01) :233-&
[9]   EFFECT OF HYDROLYSIS TIME ON THE DETERMINATION OF THE AMINO-ACID-COMPOSITION OF DIET, ILEAL DIGESTA, AND FECES SAMPLES AND ON THE DETERMINATION OF DIETARY AMINO-ACID DIGESTIBILITY COEFFICIENTS [J].
ROWAN, AM ;
MOUGHAN, PJ ;
WILSON, MN .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1992, 40 (06) :981-985
[10]  
*SAS I INC, 1985, STAT AN SYST US GUID