Biomechanics and anatomy of Lycopersicon esculentum fruit peels and enzyme-treated samples

被引:75
作者
Matas, AJ [1 ]
Cobb, ED
Bartsch, JA
Paolillo, DJ
Niklas, KJ
机构
[1] CSIC, Dept Hort, Estac Expt La Mayora, Malaga 29750, Spain
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Plant Breeding, Ithaca, NY USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Biol & Environm Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Dept Plant Biol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
cellulose microfibrils; epidermis; fruit cracking; plant biomechanics; Solanaceae; strain-hardening; tomato fruit;
D O I
10.3732/ajb.91.3.352
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
We report the biomechanics and anatomy of fruit wall peels (before and after cellulase/pectinase treatment) from two Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars (i.e., Inbred 10 and Sweet 100 cherry tomatoes). Samples were tested before and after enzyme treatment in uniaxial tension to determine their rate of creep, plastic and instantaneous elastic strains, breaking stress (strength), and work of fracture. The fruit peels of both cultivars exhibited pronounced viscoelastic and strain-hardening behavior, but differed significantly in their rheological behavior and magnitudes of material properties, e.g., Inbred 10 peels crept less rapidly and accumulated more plastic strains (but less rapidly), were stiffer and stronger, and had a larger work of fracture than Sweet 100 peels. The cuticular membrane (CM) also differed; e.g., Sweet 100 CM strain-softened at forces that caused Inbred 10 to strain-harden. The mechanical behavior of peels and their CM correlated with anatomical differences. The Inbred 10 CM develops in subepidermal cell layers, whereas the Sweet 100 CM is poorly developed below the epidermis. Based on these and other observations, we posit that strain-hardening involves the realignment of CM fibrillar elements and that this phenomenon is less pronounced for Sweet 100 because fewer cell walls contribute to its CM compared to Inbred 10.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 360
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]  
HENRY ZA, 1974, T AM SOC AGR ENG, V99, P787
[12]  
Holloway P. J., 1982, The plant cuticle, P1
[13]  
Jeffree C.E., 1996, PLANT CUTICLES INTEG, P33
[14]  
JUNIPER BE, 1991, MICROBIAL ECOLOGY LE, P22
[15]   Micromechanics of plant tissues beyond the linear-elastic range [J].
Köhler, L ;
Spatz, HC .
PLANTA, 2002, 215 (01) :33-40
[16]  
Kolattukudy P.E., 1996, PLANT CUTICLES INTEG, P83, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.MICRON.2007.11.010
[17]  
Kolattukudy P.E., 1980, Lipids: Structure and Function, P571, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-675404-9.50024-2, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-675404-9.50024-2]
[18]   BIOMECHANICS AND ALGINIC ACID COMPOSITION DURING HYDRODYNAMIC ADAPTATION BY EGREGIA-MENZIESII (PHAEOPHYTA) JUVENILES [J].
KRAEMER, GP ;
CHAPMAN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 1991, 27 (01) :47-53
[19]   TISSUE STRESSES IN GROWING-PLANT ORGANS [J].
KUTSCHERA, U .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1989, 77 (01) :157-163
[20]  
NIKLAS K.J., 1992, PLANT BIOMECHANICS