Review of selenium toxicity in the aquatic food chain

被引:612
作者
Hamilton, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Envrionm Res Ctr, US Geol Survey, Biol Resources Div, Yankton, SD 57078 USA
关键词
selenium; food chain; interactions; species sensitivity; thresholds; controversy;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.01.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In many environmental contaminant situations selenium has become the primary element of concern because of its bioaccumulative nature in food webs. Initial concerns about selenium were related to fish kills at Belews Lake, NC, Martin Lake, TX, and Kesterson Reservoir, CA, and to bird deformities at Kesterson Reservoir. Additional concerns were identified under the National Irrigation Water Quality Program at Salton Sea, CA, Kendrick, WY, Stewart Lake, UT, and Grand Valley and Uncompahgre Valley, CO. Recent studies have raised concerns about selenium impacts on aquatic resources in Southeastern Idaho and British Columbia. The growing discomfort among the scientific community with a waterborne criterion has lead the US Environment Protection Agency to consider a tissue-based criterion for selenium. Some aquatic ecosystems have been slow to recover from selenium contamination episodes. In recent years, non-governmental researchers have been proposing relatively high selenium thresholds in diet and tissue relative to those proposed by governmental researchers. This difference in opinions is due in part to the selection of datasets and caveats in selecting scientific literature. In spite of the growing selenium literature, there are needs for additional research on neglected organisms. This review also discusses the interaction of selenium with other elements, inconsistent effects of selenium on survival and growth of fish, and differences in depuration rates and sensitivity among species. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 31
页数:31
相关论文
共 249 条
[41]  
DAVIS E A, 1988, California Agriculture, V42, P18
[42]   Critical review of proposed residue-based selenium toxicity thresholds for freshwater fish [J].
DeForest, DK ;
Brix, KV ;
Adams, WJ .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1999, 5 (06) :1187-1228
[43]  
DESBOROUGH G, 1999, 99129 US GEOL SURV
[44]  
Diplock A T, 1976, CRC Crit Rev Toxicol, V4, P271
[45]   Further studies on the effectiveness of arsenic in preventing selenium poisoning [J].
Dubois, KP ;
Moxon, AL ;
Olson, OE .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1940, 19 (05) :477-482
[46]   MUTUAL PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF MERCURY AND SELENIUM IN JAPANESE QUAIL [J].
ELBEGEARMI, MM ;
SUNDE, ML ;
GANTHER, HE .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1977, 56 (01) :313-322
[47]   CONCENTRATIONS, DISTRIBUTION, AND SOURCES OF SELENIUM FROM IRRIGATED LANDS IN WESTERN UNITED-STATES [J].
ENGBERG, RA ;
SYLVESTER, MA .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 1993, 119 (03) :522-536
[48]   Selenium budgets for Lake Powell and the upper Colorado River Basin [J].
Engberg, RA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1999, 35 (04) :771-786
[49]  
ENGBERG RA, 1992, AM I HYDROLOGY, P184
[50]  
ENGBERG RA, 1998, REMEDIATION IRRIGATI, P57