Body composition, as assessed by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in a healthy paediatric population

被引:46
作者
Fors, H [1 ]
Gelander, L
Bjarnason, R
Albertsson-Wikland, K
Bosaeus, I
机构
[1] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Queen Silvia Childrens Hosp, Goteborg Pediat Growth Res Ctr, SE-41385 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Nutr, SE-41385 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
bioelectrical impedance; body composition; children; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry;
D O I
10.1080/08035250213215
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement between body composition measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and multifrequency bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Fat-free mass (FFM), body fat mass and body fatness (percentage fat) were measured by DXA, BIA and BIS in 61 healthy children (37M, 24F, aged 10.9-13.9 y). Estimates of FFM, body fat mass and body fatness were highly correlated (r = 0.73-0.96, p < 0.0001) between the different methods. However, a Bland-Altman comparison showed wide limits of agreement between the methods. The mean differences between methods for FFM ranged from -2.31 +/- 7.76 kg to 0.48 +/- 7.58 kg. Mean differences for body fat mass ranged from 0.16 +/- 5.06 kg to 2.95 +/- 5.65 kg and for body fatness from -2.3 +/- 7.8% to 0.8 +/- 9.3%. Calculations of body composition with BIS were not superior to BIA. However, BIA overestimated fat mass in lean subjects and underestimated fat mass in overweight subjects more than BIS, compared with DXA. Conclusion: The methods used provided estimates of FFM, body fat mass and body fatness that were highly correlated in a population of healthy children. However, the large limits of agreement derived from the Bland-Altman procedure suggest that the methods should not be used interchangeably.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 760
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AM J PHYSIOL
[2]   BIOELECTRIC IMPEDANCE PHASE-ANGLE AND BODY-COMPOSITION [J].
BAUMGARTNER, RN ;
CHUMLEA, WC ;
ROCHE, AF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1988, 48 (01) :16-23
[3]   Measurement of body fat in young and elderly women: Comparison between a four-compartment model and widely used reference methods [J].
BergsmaKadijk, JA ;
Baumeister, B ;
Deurenberg, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1996, 75 (05) :649-657
[4]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   Body composition measurement: A review of hydrodensitometry, anthropometry, and impedance methods [J].
Brodie, D ;
Moscrip, V ;
Hutcheon, R .
NUTRITION, 1998, 14 (03) :296-310
[7]  
DEURENBERG P, 1991, INT J OBESITY, V15, P17
[8]  
Ellis KJ, 1996, INT J OBESITY, V20, P866
[9]   Bioelectrical impedance methods in clinical research: A follow-up to the NIH technology assessment conference [J].
Ellis, KJ ;
Bell, SJ ;
Chertow, GM ;
Chumlea, WC ;
Knox, TA ;
Kotler, DP ;
Lukaski, HC ;
Schoeller, DA .
NUTRITION, 1999, 15 (11-12) :874-880
[10]  
Ellis KJ, 1999, AM J CLIN NUTR, V70, P847