Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit

被引:166
作者
Johnston, G
Crombie, IK
Davies, HTO
Alder, EM
Millard, A
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Gen Practice, Dunluce Hlth Ctr, Belfast BT9 7HF, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Ninewells Med Sch, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Dundee, Scotland
[3] Univ St Andrews, Dept Management, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[4] Univ Glasgow, Scottish Clin Audit Resource Ctr, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
来源
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE | 2000年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
audit; attitudes; barriers; facilitating factors;
D O I
10.1136/qhc.9.1.23
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective-To review the literature on the benefits and disadvantages of clinical and medical audit, and to assess the main facilitators and barriers to conducting the audit process. Design-A comprehensive literature review was undertaken through a thorough review of Medline and CINAHL databases using the keywords of "audit", "audit of audits", and "evaluation of audits" and a handsearch of the indexes of relevant journals for key papers. Results-Findings from 93 publications were reviewed. These ranged from single case studies of individual audit projects through retrospective reviews of departmental audit programmes to studies of interface projects between primary and secondary care. The studies reviewed incorporated the experiences of a wide variety of clinicians, from medical consultants to professionals allied to medicine and from those involved in unidisciplinary and multidisciplinary ventures. Perceived benefits of audit included improved communication among colleagues and other professional groups, improved patient care, increased professional satisfaction, and better administration. Some disadvantages of audit were perceived as diminished clinical ownership, fear of Litigation, hierarchical and territorial suspicions, and professional isolation. The main barriers to clinical audit can be classified under five main headings. These are lack of resources, lack of expertise or advice in project design and analysis, problems between groups and group members, lack of an overall plan for audit, and organisational impediments. Key facilitating factors to audit were also identified: they included modern medical records systems, effective training, dedicated staff, protected time, structured programmes, and a shared dialogue between purchasers and providers. Conclusions-Clinical audit can be a valuable assistance to any programme which aims to improve the quality of health care and its delivery. Yet without a coherent strategy aimed at nurturing effective audits, valuable opportunities will be lost. Paying careful attention to the professional attitudes highlighted in this review may help audit to deliver on some of its promise.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 36
页数:14
相关论文
共 90 条
[61]   In pursuit of quality: The National Institute for Clinical Excellence [J].
Rawlins, M .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9158) :1079-1082
[62]   QUALITY AND HEALTH-CARE IN SWEDEN [J].
REIZENSTEIN, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 303 (6807) :900-902
[63]  
RMSEY M, 1996, WYTHENSHAWE HOSP CLI
[64]   EVALUATION OF MEDICAL AUDIT [J].
ROBINSON, MB .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1994, 48 (05) :435-440
[65]   Audit in the therapy professions: Some constraints on progress [J].
Robinson, S .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1996, 5 (04) :206-214
[66]  
ROBINSON S, 1996, INT J THEORY RES PRA, V2, P373
[67]  
RUMSEY M, 1996, EVALUATING AUDIT N S
[68]  
RUSSELL IT, 1992, BRIT MED J, V304, P1480
[69]   Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England [J].
Scally, G ;
Donaldson, LJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7150) :61-65
[70]  
Sellu D, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P128