Qualitative case study methodology in nursing research: an integrative review

被引:86
作者
Anthony, Susan [1 ,2 ]
Jack, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Sch Nursing, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Arthur Labatt Family Sch Nursing, London, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
case study; integrative review; methodology; nursing; qualitative research; DECISION-MAKING; CRITICAL THINKING; CARE; NURSES; HOME; PEOPLE; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04998.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Qualitative case study methodology in nursing research: an integrative review. This paper is a report of an integrative review conducted to critically analyse the contemporary use of qualitative case study methodology in nursing research. Increasing complexity in health care and increasing use of case study in nursing research support the need for current examination of this methodology. In 2007, a search for case study research (published 2005-2007) indexed in the CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Sociological Abstracts and SCOPUS databases was conducted. A sample of 42 case study research papers met the inclusion criteria. Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review method guided the analysis. Confusion exists about the name, nature and use of case study. This methodology, including terminology and concepts, is often invisible in qualitative study titles and abstracts. Case study is an exclusive methodology and an adjunct to exploring particular aspects of phenomena under investigation in larger or mixed-methods studies. A high quality of case study exists in nursing research. Judicious selection and diligent application of literature review methods promote the development of nursing science. Case study is becoming entrenched in the nursing research lexicon as a well-accepted methodology for studying phenomena in health and social care, and its growing use warrants continued appraisal to promote nursing knowledge development. Attention to all case study elements, process and publication is important in promoting authenticity, methodological quality and visibility.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1181
页数:11
相关论文
共 76 条
[51]   What makes a good midwife? An integrative review of methodologically-diverse research [J].
Nicholls, Lynn ;
Webb, Christine .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2006, 56 (04) :414-429
[52]  
Patton M.Q., 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, V3rd ed.
[53]   Strategies to increase research-based practice - Interplay with unit culture [J].
Pepler, Carolyn J. ;
Edgar, Linda ;
Frisch, Sara ;
Rennick, Janet ;
Swidzinski, Marika ;
White, Carole ;
Brown, Thomas ;
Gross, Julie .
CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST, 2006, 20 (01) :23-31
[54]  
Salminen A., 2006, AUST OCCUP THER J, V53, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1440-1630.2006.00540.X, 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00540.x]
[55]  
Sandelowski M., 2007, HDB SYNTHESIZING QUA
[56]  
Schmitt N, 2006, PROF CASE MANAG, V11, P37
[57]  
Shaw R.L., 2004, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V4
[58]   Community psychiatric nurses and the care co-ordinator role: squeezed to provide 'limited nursing' [J].
Simpson, A .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2005, 52 (06) :689-699
[59]  
SITTNER BJ, 2005, AM J MATERNAL CHILD, V30, P121
[60]   Patterns of community relationship: nurses, non-governmental organizations and internally displaced persons [J].
Solheim, K. .
INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2005, 52 (01) :60-67