Comparison of ADHD symptom subtypes as source-specific syndromes

被引:91
作者
Gadow, KD [1 ]
Drabick, DAG [1 ]
Loney, J [1 ]
Sprafkin, J [1 ]
Salisbury, H [1 ]
Azizian, A [1 ]
Schwartz, J [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychiat, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
ADHD; DSM-IV; validity; diagnosis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00306.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Background: This study examines differences between the three subtypes of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), inattentive (1), hyperactive-impulsive (H), and combined (C), in a heterogeneous sample of 248 boys (ages 6 to 10 years) with emotional and behavioral problems who were recruited for participation in a diagnostic study. Method: The boys and their mothers participated in an extensive evaluation that involved multiple assessments of cognitive, behavioral, academic, and family functioning. ADHD subtypes were defined on the basis of teacher alone, mother alone, and mother/teacher ratings of DSM-IV symptoms. Results: Results indicated ADHD symptom groups showed a differential pattern of impairment socially (H,C>I) and cognitively (I,C>H). The C and H groups were the most and least impaired overall, respectively, and all subtypes were differentiated from the nonADHD clinical control or NONE (N) group in a manner consistent with the primary findings. External validation of group differences was limited, and there were marked inconsistencies in the pattern of findings depending on how groups were defined. For the most part, although the mother/teacher grouping strategy (compared with either alone) captured a greater diversity of differences between subtypes, it also obscured some. Conclusions: Observed findings are consistent with the notion that mothers and teachers interpret symptom statements in terms of behaviors that are most relevant for their daily concerns.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1149
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Achenbach T., 1991, Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile
[2]  
Achenbach T.M., 1991, MANUAL CHILD BEHAV C
[3]   CHILD ADOLESCENT BEHAVIORAL AND EMOTIONAL-PROBLEMS - IMPLICATIONS OF CROSS-INFORMANT CORRELATIONS FOR SITUATIONAL SPECIFICITY [J].
ACHENBACH, TM ;
MCCONAUGHY, SH ;
HOWELL, CT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1987, 101 (02) :213-232
[4]   THE DIFFERENTIAL VALIDITY OF TEACHER RATINGS OF INATTENTION OVERACTIVITY AND AGGRESSION [J].
ATKINS, MS ;
PELHAM, WE ;
LICHT, MH .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 17 (04) :423-435
[5]   COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA FOR ATTENTION-DEFICIT DISORDERS IN A GERMAN ELEMENTARY-SCHOOL SAMPLE [J].
BAUMGAERTEL, A ;
WOLRAICH, ML ;
DIETRICH, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1995, 34 (05) :629-638
[6]   LIMITATIONS OF THE APPLICATION OF FOURFOLD TABLE ANALYSIS TO HOSPITAL DATA [J].
BERKSON, J .
BIOMETRICS BULLETIN, 1946, 2 (03) :47-53
[7]   AGGREGATING DATA FROM MULTIPLE INFORMANTS IN CHILD-PSYCHIATRY EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH [J].
BIRD, HR ;
GOULD, MS ;
STAGHEZZA, B .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 31 (01) :78-85
[8]   SOME MISGIVINGS ABOUT MATCHING FAMILIAR FIGURES TEST AS A MEASURE OF REFLECTION-IMPULSIVITY [J].
BLOCK, J ;
BLOCK, JH ;
HARRINGT.DM .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 10 (05) :611-632
[9]   REFLECTION-IMPULSIVITY IN NORMAL AND BEHAVIOR-DISORDERED CHILDREN [J].
BROWN, RT ;
QUAY, LC .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 5 (04) :457-462
[10]   DEVELOPMENT OF A MORE RELIABLE VERSION OF MATCHING FAMILIAR FIGURES TEST [J].
CAIRNS, E ;
CAMMOCK, T .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 14 (05) :555-560