Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: Prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates

被引:71
作者
Pickhardt, PJ
Choi, JR
Hwang, I
Schindler, WR
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[2] Natl Naval Med Res Inst, Dept Radiol, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[5] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[6] Natl Naval Med Res Inst, Dept Gastroenterol, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2323031614
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate with computed tomographic (CT) colonography the prevalence and size distribution of nonadenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults and to compare the detection rates of adenomatous and nonadenomatous polyps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1233 asymptomatic adults (mean age, 57.8 years; 505 women, 728 men) underwent same-day CT colonography and optical colonoscopy procedures. CT colonoscopy studies were interpreted prospectively with a primary three-dimensional approach immediately before optical colonoscopy. Statistical analysis was performed with the chi(2) test. Size, prevalence, and by-polyp detection differences were compared between adenomatous and nonadenomatous polyps. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-six (57.7%) colorectal polyps identified at optical colonoscopy in 410 (33.3%) patients were nonadenomatous; of these lesions, 622 (82.3%) were diminutive (less than or equal to5 mm). Nonadenomatous polyps accounted for 622 (64.4%) of 966 diminutive lesions and 134 (39.9%) of 344 polyps 6 mm or larger (P < .001). The prevalence rate for nonadenomatous polyps was 8.8% (109 of 1233 patients) and 2.0% (25 of 1233 patients) at 6- and 10-mm thresholds, respectively. CT colonography by-polyp sensitivity for nonadenomatous lesions was 73.1% (98 of 134 patients) and 73.3% (22 of 30 patients) at 6- and 10-mm thresholds, respectively, compared with 85.7% (180 of 210 patients) and 92.2% (47 of 51 patients) for adenomas (P < .01). In 1065 patients that did not have a 6-mm or larger adenoma at optical colonoscopy, CT colonography depicted a nonadenomatous polyp that was 6 mm or larger in 63 (5.9%) patients and a nonadenomatous polyp that was 10 mm or larger in 15 (1.4%) patients. CONCLUSION: More than 80% of nonadenomatous polyps were diminutive, but they accounted for nearly 40% of polyps that were 6 mm or larger. Fortunately, CT colonography is significantly (P < .01) less sensitive in the detection of lesions that have no malignant potential when compared with similar-sized adenomas that have malignant potential.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 790
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] VISUAL DISAPPEARING PHENOMENON CAN RELIABLY PREDICT THE NONADENOMATOUS NATURE OF RECTAL AND RECTOSIGMOID DIMINUTIVE POLYPS AT ENDOSCOPY
    BERTONI, G
    SASSATELLI, R
    CONIGLIARO, R
    NIGRISOLI, E
    ZANONI, P
    PACCHIONE, D
    MORTILLA, MG
    BEDOGNI, G
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (05) : 588 - 591
  • [2] Clinical relevance of the small colorectal polyp
    Bond, JH
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 33 (05) : 454 - 457
  • [3] Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) - A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia
    Cotton, PB
    Durkalski, VL
    Benoit, PC
    Palesch, YY
    Mauldin, PD
    Hoffman, B
    Vining, DJ
    Small, WC
    Affronti, J
    Rex, D
    Kopecky, KK
    Ackerman, S
    Burdick, JS
    Brewington, C
    Turner, MA
    Zfass, A
    Wright, AR
    Iyer, RB
    Lynch, P
    Sivak, MV
    Butler, H
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14): : 1713 - 1719
  • [4] Virtual colonoscopy: past, present, and future
    Dachman, AH
    Yoshida, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 41 (02) : 377 - +
  • [5] A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
    Fenlon, HM
    Nunes, DP
    Schroy, PC
    Barish, MA
    Clarke, PD
    Ferrucci, JT
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) : 1496 - 1503
  • [6] Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography
    Fidler, JL
    Johnson, CD
    MacCarty, RL
    Welch, TJ
    Hara, AK
    Harmsen, WS
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2002, 27 (03): : 292 - 300
  • [7] Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate?
    Gopalswamy, N
    Shenoy, VN
    Choudhry, U
    Markert, RJ
    Peace, N
    Bhutani, MS
    Barde, CJ
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 46 (06) : 497 - 502
  • [8] Itzkowitz SH, 2002, SLEISENGER FORDTRANS, P2175
  • [9] Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps
    Johnson, CD
    Harmsen, WS
    Wilson, LA
    MacCarty, RL
    Welch, TJ
    Ilstrup, DM
    Ahlquist, DA
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 125 (02) : 311 - 319
  • [10] Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer
    Lieberman, DA
    Weiss, DG
    Bond, JH
    Ahnen, DJ
    Garewal, H
    Chejfec, G
    Harford, WV
    Provenzale, D
    Sontag, S
    Schnell, T
    Campbell, DR
    Durbin, TE
    Nelson, DB
    Ewing, SL
    Triadafilopoulos, G
    Ramirez, FC
    Lee, JG
    Collins, JF
    Fennerty, B
    Johnston, TK
    Corless, CT
    McQuaid, KR
    Sampliner, RE
    Morales, TG
    Fass, R
    Smith, R
    Maheshwari, Y
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (03) : 162 - 168