Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines

被引:4515
作者
Grundy, SM [1 ]
Cleeman, JI [1 ]
Merz, CNB [1 ]
Brewer, HB [1 ]
Clark, LT [1 ]
Hunninghake, DB [1 ]
Pasternak, RC [1 ]
Smith, SC [1 ]
Stone, NJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Heart Assoc, Dallas, TX 75231 USA
关键词
cholesterol; trials; lipoproteins; coronary disease;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.0000133317.49796.0E
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program issued an evidence-based set of guidelines on cholesterol management in 2001. Since the publication of ATP III, 5 major clinical trials of statin therapy with clinical end points have been published. These trials addressed issues that were not examined in previous clinical trials of cholesterol-lowering therapy. The present document reviews the results of these recent trials and assesses their implications for cholesterol management. Therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLC) remain an essential modality in clinical management. The trials confirm the benefit of cholesterol-lowering therapy in high-risk patients and support the ATP III treatment goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL. They support the inclusion of patients with diabetes in the high-risk category and confirm the benefits of LDL-lowering therapy in these patients. They further confirm that older persons benefit from therapeutic lowering of LDL-C. The major recommendations for modifications to footnote the ATP III treatment algorithm are the following. In high-risk persons, the recommended LDL-C goal is <100 mg/dL, but when risk is very high, an LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL is a therapeutic option, ie, a reasonable clinical strategy, on the basis of available clinical trial evidence. This therapeutic option extends also to patients at very high risk who have a baseline LDL-C <100 mg/dL. Moreover, when a high-risk patient has high triglycerides or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), consideration can be given to combining a fibrate or nicotinic acid with an LDL-lowering drug. For moderately high-risk persons (2+ risk factors and 10-year risk 10% to 20%), the recommended LDL-C goal is <130 mg/dL, but an LDL-C goal <100 mg/dL is a therapeutic option on the basis of recent trial evidence. The latter option extends also to moderately high-risk persons with a baseline LDL-C of 100 to 129 mg/dL. When LDL-lowering drug therapy is employed in high-risk or moderately high-risk persons, it is advised that intensity of therapy be sufficient to achieve at least a 30% to 40% reduction in LDL-C levels. Moreover, any person at high risk or moderately high risk who has lifestyle-related risk factors (eg, obesity, physical inactivity, elevated triglycerides, low HDL-C, or metabolic syndrome) is a candidate for TLC to modify these risk factors regardless of LDL-C level. Finally, for people in lower-risk categories, recent clinical trials do not modify the goals and cutpoints of therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 239
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] Effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods vs lovastatin on serum lipids and C-reactive protein
    Jenkins, DJA
    Kendall, CWC
    Marchie, A
    Faulkner, DA
    Wong, JMW
    de Souza, R
    Emam, A
    Parker, TL
    Vidgen, E
    Lapsley, KG
    Trautwein, EA
    Josse, RG
    Leiter, LA
    Connelly, PW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (04): : 502 - 510
  • [22] Comparative dose efficacy study of Atorvastatin versus Simvastatin, Pravastatin, Lovastatin, and Fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (The CURVES study)
    Jones, P
    Kafonek, S
    Laurora, I
    Hunninghake, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 81 (05) : 582 - 587
  • [23] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvalstaltin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* trial)
    Jones, PH
    Davidson, MH
    Stein, EA
    Bays, HE
    McKenney, JM
    Miller, E
    Cain, VA
    Blasetto, JW
    STELLAR Study Grp
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (02) : 152 - 160
  • [24] LAW MR, 1994, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V48, P305
  • [25] BY HOW MUCH AND HOW QUICKLY DOES REDUCTION IN SERUM-CHOLESTEROL CONCENTRATION LOWER RISK OF ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE
    LAW, MR
    WALD, NJ
    THOMPSON, SG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6925): : 367 - 373
  • [26] Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Law, MR
    Wald, NJ
    Rudnicka, AR
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7404): : 1423 - 1427
  • [27] MCNAMARA JR, 1995, CLIN CHEM, V41, P232
  • [28] SERUM-CHOLESTEROL LEVEL AND MORTALITY FINDINGS FOR MEN SCREENED IN THE MULTIPLE RISK FACTOR INTERVENTION TRIAL
    NEATON, JD
    BLACKBURN, H
    JACOBS, D
    KULLER, L
    LEE, DJ
    SHERWIN, R
    SHIH, J
    STAMLER, J
    WENTWORTH, D
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 152 (07) : 1490 - 1500
  • [29] Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis - A randomized controlled trial
    Nissen, SE
    Tuzcu, EM
    Schoenhagen, P
    Brown, BG
    Ganz, P
    Vogel, RA
    Crowe, T
    Howard, G
    Cooper, CJ
    Brodie, B
    Grines, CL
    DeMaria, AN
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (09): : 1071 - 1080
  • [30] Lack of a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and pravastatin in healthy volunteers
    Pan, WJ
    Gustavson, LE
    Achari, R
    Rieser, MJ
    Ye, X
    Gutterman, C
    Wallin, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 40 (03) : 316 - 323