Labour market regulation, industrial relations and technological regimes: a tale of comparative advantage

被引:65
作者
Bassanini, A
Ernst, E
机构
[1] OECD, DEELSA, F-75775 Paris 16, France
[2] OECD, Dept Econ, F-75775 Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1093/icc/11.3.391
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper we present comparative evidence from OECD countries concerning the impact of labour market institutions and regulations on technological specialization. The interplay between the degree of labour market flexibility, the system of industrial relations and the knowledge base of different industries determines the viability of different human resource strategies, thereby shaping the patterns of comparative advantage. Our empirical results show that countries with coordinated industrial-relations systems and strict employment protection tend to specialize in industries with a cumulative knowledge base. We argue that two mechanisms explain these patterns. The larger the scope for resorting to internal labour markets, the lower the adjustment costs imposed by labour market regulation. Furthermore, employment protection and coordinated industrial-relations regimes, by aligning workers' and firms' objectives, encourage firm-sponsored training as well as the accumulation of firm-specific competencies, allowing firms to fully exploit the potential of the internal labour market.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 426
页数:36
相关论文
共 63 条
[41]  
Kugler AD, 2000, 134 IZA
[42]  
Lehrer M., 1999, Industry and Innovation, V6, P5
[43]  
Lynch, 1994, TRAINING PRIVATE SEC
[44]  
Malcomson JM, 1997, J ECON LIT, V35, P1916
[45]  
MALERBA F, 1995, CAMBRIDGE J ECON, V19, P47
[46]  
Malerba F., 2000, Industrial and Corporate Change, V9, P289, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/9.2.289
[47]  
MALERBA F, 2001, C SOURC TECHN CHANG
[48]  
Malerba Franco, 1997, IND CORP CHANG, V6, P83, DOI [10.1093/icc/6.1.83(, DOI 10.1093/ICC/6.1.83]
[49]  
March J. G., 1958, ORGANIZATIONS, DOI DOI 10.2307/2390654
[50]  
MARSILI O, 2001, ANATOMY EVOLUTION IN