Attention differentially modulates the coupling of fMRI BOLD and evoked potential signal amplitudes in the human somatosensory cortex

被引:36
作者
Arthurs, OJ
Johansen-Berg, H
Matthews, PM
Boniface, SJ
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Clin Neurol, Ctr FMRIB, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Wolfson Brain Imaging Ctr, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
fMRI; SEP; neurovascular coupling; attention; somatosensory;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-003-1827-4
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Blood oxygenation dependent contrast (BOLD) fMRI is used increasingly to probe "connectivity" based on temporal correlations between signals from different brain regions. This approach assumes that there is constant local coupling of neuronal activity to the associated BOLD response. Here we test the alternative hypothesis that there is not a fixed relationship between these by determining whether attention modulates apparent neurovascular coupling. Electrical stimulation of the median nerve was applied with and without a concurrent distractor task (serial subtraction). Increasing stimulation intensity increased discomfort ratings (p<0.001) and was associated with a significant increase in both somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) N20-P25 amplitude and BOLD fMRI response in the contralateral primary (SI) and bilaterally in the secondary somatosensory cortices. Attention to stimulation was reduced during distractor task performance and resulted in an overall trend for reduction in discomfort (p=0.056), which was significant at the highest stimulation level (p<0.05). A volume of interest analysis confined to SI confirmed a reduction in BOLD response with distraction (p<0.001). However, distraction did not measurably affect SEP magnitude. The quantitative relationship between the BOLD fMRI response and the local field potential measured by the early SEP response therefore varies with attentional context. This may be a consequence of differences in either local spatial or temporal signal summation for the two methods. Either interpretation suggests caution in assuming a simple, fixed relationship between local BOLD changes and related electrophysiological activity.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   POTENTIALS-EVOKED IN HUMAN AND MONKEY CEREBRAL-CORTEX BY STIMULATION OF THE MEDIAN NERVE - A REVIEW OF SCALP AND INTRACRANIAL RECORDINGS [J].
ALLISON, T ;
MCCARTHY, G ;
WOOD, CC ;
JONES, SJ .
BRAIN, 1991, 114 :2465-2503
[2]  
ALLISON T, 1980, PROGR CLIN NEUROPHYS
[3]   How well do we understand the neural origins of the fMRI BOLD signal? [J].
Arthurs, OJ ;
Boniface, S .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2002, 25 (01) :27-31
[4]   Linear coupling between functional magnetic resonance imaging and evoked potential amplitude in human somatosensory cortex [J].
Arthurs, OJ ;
Williams, EJ ;
Carpenter, TA ;
Pickard, JD ;
Boniface, SJ .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 101 (04) :803-806
[5]   A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention [J].
Brefczynski, JA ;
DeYoe, EA .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 2 (04) :370-374
[6]   Tactile attention tasks enhance activation in somatosensory regions of parietal cortex: A positron emission tomography study [J].
Burton, H ;
Abend, NS ;
MacLeod, AMK ;
Sinclair, RJ ;
Snyder, AZ ;
Raichle, ME .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 1999, 9 (07) :662-674
[7]   Pain perception: Is there a role for primary somatosensory cortex? [J].
Bushnell, MC ;
Duncan, GH ;
Hofbauer, RK ;
Ha, B ;
Chen, JI ;
Carrier, B .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (14) :7705-7709
[9]  
CORBETTA M, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P1202
[10]   NEURAL MECHANISMS UNDERLYING BRAIN WAVES - FROM NEURAL MEMBRANES TO NETWORKS [J].
DASILVA, FL .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 79 (02) :81-93