Day-to-day glucose variability during pregnancy in women with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: Glucose profiles measured with the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

被引:37
作者
Kerssen, A
de Valk, HW
Visser, GHA
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Med, Dept Perinatol & Gynaecol, NL-3508 AB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Med, Dept Internal Med & Dermatol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00203.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Objective To observe day-to-day variability in glucose levels in pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes using the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) and to assess the usefulness of continuous glucose measurements for adjustment of insulin treatment. Design A prospective observational study. Setting The obstetrical outpatient clinic of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Population Pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Methods Thirty-one pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes used the CGMS for two consecutive days. Patients were classified in two groups (high vs low day-to-day variability) based on visual inspection of the glucose excursions. The relationship between day-to-day variability and the variables HbA(1c), maternal age and body mass index (BMI), duration of diabetes, number of self-monitored blood glucose levels, number of insulin injections, gestational age, nutrition, physical activity, White classification, living with children and method of insulin administration was determined. The two days of the first 20 CGMS measurements were separated and four physicians were asked to give recommendations on treatment adjustment for each separate day. Main outcome measures Mean absolute difference (MAD) was calculated for each patient as measure of day-to-day variability. Results Seventeen patients (55%) were classified as having low (MAD 0.92-2.33 mmol/L) and 14 (45%) as having high day-to-day variability (MAD 2.41-6.12 mmol/L). Of the variables measured, only the relation between MAD and HbA(1c) was significant (r = 0.58, P = 0.001). The difference in recommendation on treatment adjustment between the days of the CGMS measurement ranged from 29% to 48%. This percentage was significantly higher in the high day-to-day variability group (48 vs 33%, P = 0.01). Conclusion Day-to-day glucose variability is high and the treatment of pregnant women with Type I diabetes is a problem. Fine-tuning of insulin regimens based on two-day measurements with the CGMS is not advisable.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 924
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
*ADA, 2003, DIABETES CARE S1, V26, pS91
[2]
Glucose measurement in patients with diabetes mellitus with dermal interstitial fluid [J].
Bantle, JP ;
Thomas, W .
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE, 1997, 130 (04) :436-441
[3]
Macrosomia despite good glycaemic control in Type I diabetic pregnancy; results of a nationwide study in The Netherlands [J].
Evers, IM ;
de Valk, HW ;
Mol, BWJ ;
ter Braak, EWMT ;
Visser, GHA .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2002, 45 (11) :1484-1489
[4]
Risk of complications of pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: nationwide prospective study in the Netherlands [J].
Evers, IN ;
de Valk, HW ;
Visser, GHA .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7445) :915-918A
[5]
CONTINUOUS IN-VIVO MONITORING IN DIABETES - THE SUBCUTANEOUS GLUCOSE-CONCENTRATION [J].
FISCHER, U .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 39 :21-29
[6]
Kerssen A, 2003, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, V13, P309, DOI 10.1080/jmf.13.5.309.313
[7]
Mastrototaro J, 1999, J PEDIATR ENDOCR MET, V12, P751
[8]
ESTIMATION OF BLOOD-GLUCOSE VARIABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS [J].
MOBERG, E ;
KOLLIND, M ;
LINS, PE ;
ADAMSON, U .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1993, 53 (05) :507-514
[9]
SUBCUTANEOUS GLUCOSE-CONCENTRATION IN HUMANS - REAL ESTIMATION AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING [J].
STERNBERG, F ;
MEYERHOFF, C ;
MENNEL, FJ ;
BISCHOF, F ;
PFEIFFER, EF .
DIABETES CARE, 1995, 18 (09) :1266-1269
[10]
Does fall in tissue glucose precede fall in blood glucose? [J].
Sternberg, F ;
Meyerhoff, C ;
Mennel, FJ ;
Mayer, H ;
Bischof, F ;
Pfeiffer, EF .
DIABETOLOGIA, 1996, 39 (05) :609-612