Trends and characteristics of induced labour in the United States, 1989-98

被引:58
作者
MacDorman, MF
Mathews, TJ
Martin, JA
Malloy, MH
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Vital Stat, Natl Ctr Hlth Stat, Hyattsville, MD 20782 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Pediat, Galveston, TX 77550 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-3016.2002.00425.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Induction of labour is one of the fastest growing medical procedures in the United States. In 1998, 19.2% of all US births were a product of induced labour, more than twice the 9.0% in 1989. Induction of labour has been efficacious in the management of post-term pregnancy and in expediting delivery when the mother or infant is sufficiently ill to make continuation of the pregnancy hazardous. However, the recent rapid increase in induction, and particularly the doubling of the induction rate for preterm pregnancies (from 6.7% in 1989 to 13.4% in 1998), has generated concern among some clinicians. The present study uses vital statistics natality data to examine the epidemiology of induced labour in the US. Multivariable analysis is used to examine the probability of having an induced delivery in relation to a wide variety of socio-demographic and medical characteristics, and also in relation to relative indications and contraindications for induced labour as outlined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Induction rates were higher for women who were non-Hispanic white, college educated, born in the US, primaparae and those with intensive prenatal care utilisation. Induction rates were also higher for women with various medical conditions including hypertension, eclampsia and renal disease. For non-Hispanic white women with singleton births, 59% of the increase in the preterm birth rate from 1989 to 1998 can be accounted for by the increase in preterm inductions. The adjusted odds ratio for neonatal mortality among preterm births with induced labour was 1.20 [95% confidence interval 1.11, 1.31]. The rapid increase in induction rates, particularly among preterm births, marks a shift in the obstetric management of pregnancy. More detailed studies are needed to examine physician decision-making protocols, particularly for preterm induction, and to assess the impact of these practice changes on patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 273
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ACOG, 1999, ACOG PRACT B
[2]  
ALEXANDER GR, 1987, AM J PREV MED, V3, P243
[3]   Maternal and neonatal outcome following prolonged labor induction [J].
Bahn, SA ;
Jacobson, J ;
Petersen, F .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (03) :403-407
[4]  
BISHOP EH, 1955, OBSTET GYNECOL, V5, P519
[5]   THE QUALITY OF THE NEW BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATA - A VALIDATION-STUDY IN NORTH-CAROLINA [J].
BUESCHER, PA ;
TAYLOR, KP ;
DAVIS, MH ;
BOWLING, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (08) :1163-1165
[6]  
Buist R, 1999, NEW ZEAL MED J, V112, P251
[7]   The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997 [J].
Coonrod, DV ;
Bay, RC ;
Kishi, GY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (06) :1355-1360
[8]  
CROWLEY P, COCHRANE LIB
[9]  
Daltveit AK, 1999, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V149, P1128
[10]   How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies. [J].
Dobie S.A. ;
Baldwin L.M. ;
Rosenblatt R.A. ;
Fordyce M.A. ;
Andrilla C.H. ;
Hart L.G. .
Maternal and Child Health Journal, 1998, 2 (3) :145-154