The evolution of protein domain families

被引:88
作者
Buljan, Marija [1 ]
Bateman, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Wellcome Trust Sanger Inst, Hinxton CB10 1SA, England
关键词
domain shuffling; immunoglobulin superfamily; multidomain protein; protein domain; protein evolution; MOLECULAR-MECHANISMS; GENOME EVOLUTION; REARRANGEMENTS; PROMISCUITY; RECEPTORS;
D O I
10.1042/BST0370751
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Protein domains are the common currency of protein structure and function. over 10000 such protein families have now been collected in the Pfam database. Using these data along with animal gene phylogenies from TreeFam allowed us to investigate the (lain and loss of protein domains. Most gains and losses of domains occur at protein termini. We show that the nature of changes is similar after speciation or duplication events. However, changes in domain architecture happen at a higher frequency after gene duplication. We suggest that the bias towards protein termini is largely because insertion and deletion of domains at most positions in a protein are likely to disrupt the structure of existing domains. We can also use Pfam to trace the evolution of specific families. For example, the immunoglobulin superfamily can be traced over 500 million years during its expansion into one of the largest families in the human genome. it can be shown that this protein family has its origins in basic animals such as the poriferan sponges where it is found in cell-surface-receptor proteins. We can trace how the structure and sequence of this family diverged during vertebrate evolution into constant and variable domains that are found in the antibodies of our immune system as well as in neural and muscle proteins.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 755
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Current topics in genome evolution: Molecular mechanisms of new gene formation [J].
Babushok, D. V. ;
Ostertag, E. M. ;
Kazazian, H. H., Jr. .
CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES, 2007, 64 (05) :542-554
[2]   Catalysing new reactions during evolution: Economy of residues and mechanism [J].
Bartlett, GJ ;
Borkakoti, N ;
Thornton, JM .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 331 (04) :829-860
[3]   Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes [J].
Basu, Malay Kumar ;
Carmel, Liran ;
Rogozin, Igor B. ;
Koonin, Eugene V. .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2008, 18 (03) :449-461
[4]  
Bateman A, 2004, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V32, pD138, DOI [10.1093/nar/gkh121, 10.1093/nar/gkr1065, 10.1093/nar/gkp985]
[5]   Domain rearrangements in protein evolution [J].
Björklund, ÅK ;
Ekman, D ;
Light, S ;
Frey-Skött, J ;
Elofsson, A .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 353 (04) :911-923
[6]   Evolution of the protein repertoire [J].
Chothia, C ;
Gough, J ;
Vogel, C ;
Teichmann, SA .
SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5626) :1701-1703
[7]   Identifying nature's protein lego set [J].
Das, S ;
Smith, TF .
ADVANCES IN PROTEIN CHEMISTRY, VOL 54: ANALYSIS OF AMINO ACID SEQUENCES, 2000, 54 :159-183
[8]   Quantification of the elevated rate of domain rearrangements in Metazoa [J].
Ekman, Diana ;
Bjoerklund, Asa K. ;
Elofsson, Arne .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2007, 372 (05) :1337-1348
[9]   Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events [J].
Enright, AJ ;
Iliopoulos, I ;
Kyrpides, NC ;
Ouzounis, CA .
NATURE, 1999, 402 (6757) :86-90
[10]   TOWARD DEFINING COURSE OF EVOLUTION - MINIMUM CHANGE FOR A SPECIFIC TREE TOPOLOGY [J].
FITCH, WM .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1971, 20 (04) :406-&