Informant-reports of personality disorder: Relation to self-reports and future research directions

被引:254
作者
Klonsky, ED [1 ]
Oltmanns, TF [1 ]
Turkheimer, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Psychol, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
personality disorders; informants; self-report; assessment; Axis-II;
D O I
10.1093/clipsy/9.3.300
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Most instruments that assess personality disorder rely principally on self-report. However, there are major limitations to using self-report for the diagnosis of personality pathology. First, the self provides only one opinion. Second, like everyone else, people with personality disorders are frequently unable to view themselves realistically and are unaware of the effect of their behavior on other people. Using informant data, therefore, may improve the reliability and validity of diagnostic assessment. A review of the literature reveals that agreement between informant- and self-reports of personality disorder is modest at best, even though informants tend to agree with each other. Self-informant concordance appears to be higher for older subjects and for Cluster B traits (excluding narcissism). Further research should focus on methods of resolving discrepancies between self- and informant-reports of personality disorder and determining when self or informant data are more valid.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 311
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [51] A prototype matching approach to diagnosing personality disorders: Toward DSM-V
    Westen, D
    Shedler, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2000, 14 (02) : 109 - 126
  • [52] Widiger T. A., 1993, Psychological Inquiry, V4, P75, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI0402_1
  • [53] WIDIGER TA, IN PRESS CLIN PERSON
  • [54] ZIMMERMAN M, 1988, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V45, P733
  • [55] ZIMMERMAN M, 1986, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V47, P261
  • [56] ZIMMERMAN M, 1994, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V51, P225