Harmonization of critical result management in laboratory medicine

被引:44
作者
Campbell, C. A. [1 ]
Horvath, A. R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Hosp, SEALS Dept Clin Chem, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Screening & Test Evaluat Program, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Med Sci, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
关键词
Alert result; Critical result; Laboratory medicine; Patient safety; PATHOLOGISTS Q-PROBES; CRITICAL-VALUES POLICIES; CRITICAL LIMITS; NOTIFICATION; RECOMMENDATIONS; SAFETY; SYSTEM; SERUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.cca.2013.11.004
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Unsafe medical care is a major source of disabling injuries and death throughout the world. The failure to notify, follow up, and action critical results, which signify life threatening situations, is of particular concern and may cause avoidable morbidity and mortality. International accreditation standards require pathology laboratories to have a system for the timely and reliable communication of critical results to clinical personnel responsible for patient care. In response, various practices and a number of different terminologies have been described in the literature. Increased attention to patient safety standards and multinational surveys, however, highlighted shortcomings and inefficiencies in existing communication systems. These failures and variations in practice call for clear guidance and harmonization of approaches in order to improve communications and to provide safer patient care. The objectives of this review are to create a harmonized terminology and to learn from international practices by systematically reviewing the best available evidence on existing approaches. Based on literature review findings we highlight key areas where harmonization is necessary and feasible and offer a conceptual framework and methods for designing better and more evidence-based systems for the timely notification of laboratory results that represent potential patient safety hazards. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 147
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]  
2
[22]   Laboratory defined critical value limits: How do hospital physicians perceive laboratory based critical values? [J].
Don-Wauchope, Andrew C. ;
Chetty, Vasudhevan T. .
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2009, 42 (09) :766-770
[23]   Pathology Consultation on Reporting of Critical Values [J].
Genzen, Jonathan R. ;
Tormey, Christopher A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2011, 135 (04) :505-513
[24]   Communicating Critical Test Results: Safe Practice Recommendations [J].
Hanna, Doris ;
Griswold, Paula ;
Leape, Lucian L. ;
Bates, David W. .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2005, 31 (02) :68-80
[25]  
Howanitz JH, 2006, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V130, P828
[26]   Evaluation of serum and whole blood sodium critical values [J].
Howanitz, Joan H. ;
Howanitz, Peter J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 127 (01) :56-59
[27]  
Howanitz PJ, 2002, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V126, P663
[28]  
Kenny D, 1999, SCAND J CLIN LAB INV, V59, P585
[29]  
Kost G J, 1993, MLO Med Lab Obs, V25, P22
[30]   Global trends in critical values practices and their harmonization [J].
Kost, Gerald J. ;
Hale, Kristin N. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2011, 49 (02) :167-176