Comparison of the efficacy of direct coronary stenting with sirolimus-eluting stents versus stenting with predilation by intravascular ultrasound imaging (from the DIRECT trial)

被引:13
作者
Hirohata, Atsushi
Morino, Yoshihiro
Ako, Junya
Sakurai, Ryota
Buchbinder, Maurice
Caputo, Ronald P.
Karas, Steven P.
Mishkel, Gregory J.
Mooney, Michael R.
O'Shaughnessy, Charles D.
Raizner, Albert E.
Wilensky, Robert L.
Williams, David O.
Wong, Shing-Chiu
Yock, Paul G.
Honda, Yasuhiro
Moses, Jeffrey W.
Fitzgerald, Peter J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Ctr Res Cardiovasc Intervent, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Scripps Mem Hosp, La Jolla, CA USA
[3] St Joseph Hosp, Syracuse, NY USA
[4] Hlth First Inst, Melbourne, FL USA
[5] St Johns Hosp & Mem Med Ctr, Springfield, IL USA
[6] Minneapolis Heart Inst Fdn, Minneapolis, MN USA
[7] N Ohio Heart Inst, Elyria, OH USA
[8] Methodist DeBakey Heart Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[9] Hosp Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA USA
[10] Rhode Isl Hosp, Providence, RI USA
[11] Columbia Univ, New York Presbyterian Hosp, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.046
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A direct coronary stenting technique using drug-eluting stents may decrease drug-eluting stent efficacy due to possible damage to the surface coating of the stent. The DIRECT is a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized trial designed to evaluate the direct. stenting strategy for the sirolimus-eluting Bx-Velocity stent compared with the historical control (SIRIUS trial, stenting with predilation). Volumetric and cross-sectional intravascular ultrasound analyses at 8-month follow-up were performed in 115 patients (DIRECT n= 64, control n = 51). Patient and lesion characteristics were comparable between groups. The DIRECT group achieved an equivalent uniform expansion index, defined as minimum stent area/maximum stent area X 100, compared with the control group (65.9 +/- 11.7 vs 63.1 +/- 12.7, p = NS). At 8-month follow-up, vessel, stent, lumen, and neointimal volume index (volume in cubic millimeters/length in millimeters) and percent neointimal volume were similar between the DIRECT and control groups (vessel volume index 13.9 +/- 4.40 vs 15.0 +/- 3.83; stent volume index 6.83 +/- 2.02 vs 6.94 +/- 2.04; lumen volume index 6.71 +/- 2.04 vs 6.81 +/- 2.07; neointimal volume index 0.14 +/- 0.24 vs 0.16 +/- 0.23; percent neointimal volume 3.73 +/- 6.97 vs 3.14 +/- 5.32, p = NS for all). In addition, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia distribution was significantly smaller near the distal stent edge (0.22 vs 0.098 mm 3/MM, P = 0.01 for an average neointimal volume index within 3 mm from the distal stent edge). In conclusion, direct coronary stenting with the sirolimus-eluting Bx-Velocity stent is equally effective in terms of uniform stent expansion and long-term quantitative intravascular ultrasound results compared with conventional stenting using predilation. This strategy appears to be associated with less neointimal hyperplasia near the distal stent edge. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1464 / 1467
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Ako J, 2002, CIRCULATION, V106, P520
[2]   CORONARY RESTENOSIS - EVALUATION OF A RESTENOSIS INJURY INDEX IN A SWINE MODEL [J].
BONAN, R ;
PAIEMENT, P ;
SCORTICHINI, D ;
CLOUTIER, MJ ;
LEUNG, TK .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1993, 126 (06) :1334-1340
[3]   Direct coronary stenting without predilation [J].
Briguori, C ;
Sheiban, I ;
De Gregorio, J ;
Anzuini, A ;
Montorfano, M ;
Pagnotta, P ;
Marsico, F ;
Leonardo, F ;
Di Mario, C ;
Colombo, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (07) :1910-1915
[4]   Comparison of direct stenting versus stenting with predilation for the treatment of selected coronary narrowings [J].
Brito, FS ;
Caixeta, AM ;
Perin, MA ;
Rati, M ;
Arruda, JA ;
Cantarelli, M ;
Castello, H ;
Machado, BM ;
Silva, LA ;
Ribeiro, EE ;
da Luz, PL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 89 (02) :115-120
[5]   Direct coronary stenting versus predilatation followed by stent placement [J].
Brueck, M ;
Scheinert, D ;
Wortmann, A ;
Bremer, J ;
von Korn, H ;
Klinghammer, L ;
Kramer, W ;
Flachskampf, FA ;
Daniel, WG ;
Ludwig, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 90 (11) :1187-1192
[6]   Comparison of direct coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in patients with stable angina pectoris [J].
Carrié, D ;
Khalifé, K ;
Citron, B ;
Izaaz, K ;
Hamon, M ;
Juiliard, JM ;
Leclercq, F ;
Fourcade, J ;
Lipiecki, J ;
Sabatier, R ;
Boulet, V ;
Rinaldi, JP ;
Mourali, J ;
Sabatier, R ;
Boulet, V ;
Rinaldi, JP ;
Mourali, S ;
Fatouch, M ;
El Mokhtar, E ;
Aboujaoudé, F ;
Elbaz, M ;
Grolleau, R ;
Steg, PG ;
Puel, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 87 (06) :693-698
[7]   Stent implantation without predilation in patients with a single, noncalcified coronary artery lesion [J].
Danzi, GB ;
Capuano, C ;
Fiocca, L ;
Dallavalle, F ;
Pirelli, S ;
Mauri, L ;
Quaini, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 84 (10) :1250-+
[8]  
Figulla HR, 1998, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V43, P245, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199803)43:3<245::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-9
[10]   Vascular response to Sirolimus-Eluting Stents delivered with a NonAggressive implantation technique: Comparison of intravascular ultrasound results from the multicenter, Randomized E-SIRIUS, and SIRIUS trials [J].
Hoffmann, R ;
Guagliumi, G ;
Musumeci, G ;
Reimers, B ;
Petronio, AS ;
Disco, C ;
Amoroso, G ;
Moses, JW ;
Fitzgerald, PJ ;
Schofer, J ;
Leon, MB ;
Breithardt, G .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2005, 66 (04) :499-506