Don't fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms

被引:316
作者
Ziedonis, RH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
patents; hold-up; semiconductors;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1040.0208
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
How do firms avoid being "fenced in" by owners of patented technologies used, perhaps unknowingly, in the design or manufacture of their products? This paper examines the conditions under which firms expand their own portfolios of patents in response to potential hold-up problems in markets for technology Combining insights from transactions cost theory with recent scholarship on intellectual property and its exchange, I predict firms will patent more aggressively than otherwise expected when markets for technology are highly fragmented (i.e., ownership rights to external technologies are widely distributed); this effect should be more pronounced for firms with large investments in technology-specific assets and under a strong legal-appropriability regime. Although these characteristics of firms and their external environments have been highlighted in the theoretical literature, prior research has not explored the extent to which such factors interact to shape the patenting behavior of firms. To empirically test these hypotheses, I develop a citations-based "fragmentation index" and estimate the determinants of patenting for 67 U.S. semiconductor firms between 1980 and 1994. Accumulating exclusionary rights of their own may enable firms to safeguard. their investments in new technologies while foregoing some of the costs and delays associated with ex ante contracting.
引用
收藏
页码:804 / 820
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Katila, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (03) :197-220
[2]   Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks [J].
Almeida, P ;
Kogut, B .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (07) :905-917
[3]  
[Anonymous], PATENTS CITATIONS IN
[4]  
[Anonymous], REV EC STUDIES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, INNOVATION POLICY EC
[6]   Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes [J].
Argote, L ;
McEvily, B ;
Reagans, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (04) :571-582
[7]   Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology [J].
Argyres, NS ;
Liebeskind, JP .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1998, 35 (04) :427-454
[8]  
Arora Ashish., 2001, Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy
[9]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[10]   DYNAMIC COUNT DATA MODELS OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION [J].
BLUNDELL, R ;
GRIFFITH, R ;
VANREENEN, J .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1995, 105 (429) :333-344