Don't fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms

被引:316
作者
Ziedonis, RH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
patents; hold-up; semiconductors;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1040.0208
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
How do firms avoid being "fenced in" by owners of patented technologies used, perhaps unknowingly, in the design or manufacture of their products? This paper examines the conditions under which firms expand their own portfolios of patents in response to potential hold-up problems in markets for technology Combining insights from transactions cost theory with recent scholarship on intellectual property and its exchange, I predict firms will patent more aggressively than otherwise expected when markets for technology are highly fragmented (i.e., ownership rights to external technologies are widely distributed); this effect should be more pronounced for firms with large investments in technology-specific assets and under a strong legal-appropriability regime. Although these characteristics of firms and their external environments have been highlighted in the theoretical literature, prior research has not explored the extent to which such factors interact to shape the patenting behavior of firms. To empirically test these hypotheses, I develop a citations-based "fragmentation index" and estimate the determinants of patenting for 67 U.S. semiconductor firms between 1980 and 1994. Accumulating exclusionary rights of their own may enable firms to safeguard. their investments in new technologies while foregoing some of the costs and delays associated with ex ante contracting.
引用
收藏
页码:804 / 820
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
[31]   MEASURING COMPETENCE - EXPLORING FIRM EFFECTS IN PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH [J].
HENDERSON, R ;
COCKBURN, I .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1994, 15 :63-84
[32]  
Hippel E. von, 1988, The Sources of Innovation
[33]   The US patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process [J].
Jaffe, AB .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (4-5) :531-557
[34]  
Jaffe AB, 2002, PATENTS CITATIONS IN, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0898-1221(03)80127-X
[35]  
Kim DH, 2002, B KOR CHEM SOC, V23, P225
[36]   VERTICAL INTEGRATION, APPROPRIABLE RENTS, AND THE COMPETITIVE CONTRACTING PROCESS [J].
KLEIN, B ;
CRAWFORD, RG ;
ALCHIAN, AA .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1978, 21 (02) :297-326
[37]   KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM, COMBINATIVE CAPABILITIES, AND THE REPLICATION OF TECHNOLOGY [J].
KOGUT, B ;
ZANDER, U .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (03) :383-397
[38]   Stronger protection or technological revolution: what is behind the recent surge in patenting? [J].
Kortum, S ;
Lerner, J .
CARNEGIE-ROCHESTER CONFERENCE SERIES ON PUBLIC POLICY, VOL 48, 1998, 48 :247-304
[39]   Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition [J].
Lanjouw, JO ;
Schankerman, M .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 32 (01) :129-151
[40]   Tilting the table? The use of preliminary injunctions [J].
Lanjouw, JO ;
Lerner, J .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2001, 44 (02) :573-603