Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures - a review

被引:357
作者
Rook, AJ [1 ]
Dumont, B
Isselstein, J
Osoro, K
WallisDeVries, MF
Parente, G
Mills, J
机构
[1] Inst Grassland & Environm Res, AFRC, N Wyke Res Stn, Okehampton EX20 2SB, Devon, England
[2] INRA, Unite Rech Herbivores, F-63122 St Genes Champanelle, France
[3] Univ Gottingen, Inst Pflanzenbau & Pflanzeneuchtung, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[4] Serv Reg Invest & Desarrollo Agroalimentario, Villaviciosa 33300, Asturias, Spain
[5] Vlinderstichting Dutech Butterfly Conservat, NL-6700 AM Wageningen, Netherlands
[6] Servizio Agr Aziende Sperimentali Dimostrative, I-33170 Pordenone, Italy
[7] Univ Gloucestershire, Countryside & Community Res Unir, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, Glos, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
biodiversity; grazing; breed; animal behaviour; sward structure;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.010
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
From a review of the literature, we conclude that the main mechanism by which grazing livestock affect biodiversity in pastures is the creation and maintenance of sward structural heterogeneity, particularly as a result of dietary choice. We identify lack of understanding of the currencies used by animals in their foraging decisions and the spatial scale of these decisions as major constraints to better management. We conclude that there are important differences between domestic grazing animal species in their impact on grazed communities and that these can be related to differences in dental and digestive anatomy, but also, and probably more importantly, to differences in body size. Differences between breeds within species appear to be relatively minor and again largely related to body size. We conclude that there is an urgent need to understand the genetic basis of these differences and also to separate true breed effects from effects of rearing environment. We also review the economic implications of using different animal types and conclude that there is a need for more research integrating these aspects with biodiversity outcomes. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 150
页数:14
相关论文
共 112 条
[52]  
HOUDIJK JGM, 2003, MATCHING HERBIVORE N, P213
[53]   Effects of parasitic status and level of feeding motivation on the diet selected by sheep grazing grass/clover swards [J].
Hutchings, MR ;
Gordon, IJ ;
Robertson, E ;
Kyriazakis, I ;
Jackson, F .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2000, 135 :65-75
[54]   Trade-offs between nutrient intake and faecal avoidance in herbivore foraging decisions: the effect of animal parasitic status, level of feeding motivation and sward nitrogen content [J].
Hutchings, MR ;
Kyriazakis, I ;
Gordon, IJ ;
Jackson, F .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1999, 68 (02) :310-323
[55]  
Illius Andrew W., 1993, P157
[56]   THE ALLOMETRY OF FOOD-INTAKE IN GRAZING RUMINANTS [J].
ILLIUS, AW ;
GORDON, IJ .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1987, 56 (03) :989-999
[57]   Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes [J].
Kleijn, D ;
Berendse, F ;
Smit, R ;
Gilissen, N .
NATURE, 2001, 413 (6857) :723-725
[58]  
KUIT G, 1999, LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION, P145
[59]   HOME-RANGE BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL-ORGANIZATION OF SCOTTISH BLACKFACE SHEEP [J].
LAWRENCE, AB ;
WOODGUSH, DGM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1988, 25 (01) :25-40
[60]   SIZE-BIASED FORAGING BEHAVIOR IN FERAL CATTLE [J].
LAZO, A ;
SORIGUER, RC .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1993, 36 (2-3) :99-110