Giving bad news: The family perspective

被引:92
作者
Jurkovich, GJ
Pierce, B
Pananen, L
Rivara, FP
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Sch Med,Harborview Injury Prevent & Res Ctr, Dept Surg, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Sch Med,Harborview Injury Prevent & Res Ctr, Dept Pediat, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Sch Med, Harvorview Trauma ICU, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
关键词
trauma; wounds and injuries; death; ethics; medical; physician-patient relations; communication;
D O I
10.1097/00005373-200005000-00009
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Death from trauma frequently comes without forewarning. Relating the news of death to the family is often the responsibility of trauma surgeons. The purpose of this study was to investigate the key characteristics and methods of delivering bad news from the perspective of surviving family members. Methods: We designed and administered a survey tool to surviving family members of trauma patients dying in the emergency department or intensive care unit, The tool consisted of 14 elements that surviving family members graded in importance when receiving bad news (1, least; 6, most). Respondents also judged the attention given to these elements (good, fair, or poor) by the person giving the bad news of death. Results: Fifty-four family members of 48 patients who died completed the survey (44 intensive care unit deaths, 4 emergency room deaths). Deceased patients ranged in ape from 12 to 91 years (mean, 53 gears). Death occurred within 2 days of injury in 69% of the patients and within 1 week in 83%. The most important features of delivering bad news were judged to be attitude of the news-giver (ranked most important by 72%), clarity of the message (70%), privacy (65%), and knowledge/ ability to answer questions (57%). The attire of the news-giver ranked as least important (3%). Sympathy, time for questions, and location of the conversation were ranked of intermediate importance, Touching was unwanted by 30% of the respondents, but encouraged or acceptable in 24%. Conclusion: The attitude of the news-giver, combined with clarity of the message and the time, privacy, and knowledge to answer questions are the most important aspects of giving bad news. This information should be incorporated into resident training.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 870
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Diagnosing developmental problems in children: Parents and professionals negotiate bad news [J].
Abrams, EZ ;
Goodman, JF .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 23 (02) :87-98
[2]  
Baile WF, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V86, P887, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990901)86:5<887::AID-CNCR27>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-O
[4]  
Buchanan H L, 1996, Crit Care Nurs Q, V19, P35
[5]  
BUCKMAN R, 1992, BRIT MED J, V288, P159
[6]   TOUCH AND BREAKING BAD-NEWS [J].
BUIS, C ;
DEBOO, T ;
HULL, R .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1991, 8 (04) :303-304
[7]  
Fielding R, 1998, PSYCHO-ONCOL, V7, P240, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199805/06)7:3<240::AID-PON305>3.3.CO
[8]  
2-Y
[9]   PREREGISTRATION HOUSE OFFICERS IN 8 ENGLISH REGIONS - SURVEY OF QUALITY OF TRAINING [J].
GILLARD, JH ;
DENT, THS ;
AARONS, EJ ;
SMYTHPIGOTT, PJ ;
NICHOLLS, MWN .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6913) :1180-1184
[10]   BREAKING BAD-NEWS - CONSENSUS GUIDELINES FOR MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS [J].
GIRGIS, A ;
SANSONFISHER, RW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (09) :2449-2456