Microscopic techniques as potential tools to quantify the extent of bioadhesion of liquid systems

被引:4
作者
Batchelor, H
Dettmar, P
Hampson, F
Jolliffe, I
Craig, D
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Med Res Unit, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ E Anglia, Sch Chem Sci & Pharm, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[3] Benckiser Healthcare UK Ltd, Kingston Upon Hull HU8 7DS, N Humberside, England
关键词
bioadhesion; sodium alginate; fluorescence microscopy; confocal microscopy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejps.2004.03.020
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
This work demonstrates the potential of fluorescence and confocal microscopy as techniques to quantify both the extent and duration of bioadhesion of alginate solutions to porcine oesophageal tissue using an in vitro model. The retention of low (40 kDa), medium (240 kDa) and high (416 kDa) MW alginates was quantified via three methods of analysis. Fluorimetric analysis of the dose removed from the oesophageal surface suggested that the percentage of the original dose retained at 30 min was 7.9 +/- 7.0%, 21.9 +/- 9.5% and 23.7 +/- 5.8% for the alginates in order of increasing MW. Analysis of the dose adhered at 30 min using fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that 5.5 +/- 1.9%, 7.1 +/- 2.7% and 18.2 +/- 1.7% of the original dose of the alginate solutions was retained at 30 min. The results found using confocal microscopy showed that the percentage of the original dose adhered at 30 min of the low, medium and high MW alginates were 4.5 +/- 1.9%, 7.2 +/- 5.3% and 11.8 +/- 4.3%, respectively. All techniques demonstrated significantly greater retention of the high MW solution at 30 min compared to the low MW solution. Both confocal and fluorescence microscopy may be used as techniques to evaluate the bioadhesion of liquid systems. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 346
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ADAMS RD, 1990, ADHESION, V15, P1
[2]   An in vitro mucosal model for prediction of the bioadhesion of alginate solutions to the oesophagus [J].
Batchelor, HK ;
Banning, D ;
Dettmar, PW ;
Hampson, FC ;
Jolliffe, IG ;
Craig, DQM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2002, 238 (1-2) :123-132
[3]  
Chen J.L., 1970, ADHESION BIOL SYSTEM, P163, DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-469050-9.50015-6
[4]  
Gorman SP, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V39, P642, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980315)39:4<642::AID-JBM20>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-7
[6]  
IOOSS P, 1995, P 1 WORLD M APGI APV
[7]  
ISHIDA M, 1981, CHEM PHARM BULL, V29, P810
[8]   A direct-staining method to evaluate the mucoadhesion of polymers from aqueous dispersion [J].
Kockisch, S ;
Rees, GD ;
Young, SA ;
Tsibouklis, J ;
Smart, JD .
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2001, 77 (1-2) :1-6
[9]   VISUALIZATION STUDIES OF THE MUCOADHESIVE INTERFACE [J].
LEHR, CM ;
BOUWSTRA, JA ;
SPIES, F ;
ONDERWATER, J ;
VANHETNOORDEINDE, J ;
VERMEIJKEERS, C ;
VANMUNSTEREN, CJ ;
JUNGINGER, HE .
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 1992, 18 (03) :249-260
[10]   3-AMINOPROPYLTRIETHOXYSILANE (APES) - A NEW ADVANCE IN SECTION ADHESION [J].
MADDOX, PH ;
JENKINS, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1987, 40 (10) :1256-1257