SERT: Self-Explanation Reading Training

被引:291
作者
McNamara, DS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Dept Psychol, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15326950dp3801_1
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study examined the effects of providing reading strategy instruction to improve the effectiveness of self-explanation (i.e., explaining the meaning of information to oneself while reading). The effects of the reading strategy instruction, called Self-Explanation Reading Training (SERT), were examined both in terms of comprehension scores and self-explanation quality. Half of the participants (n = 42) received SERT, which included reading strategy instruction and self-explanation practice with 4 science texts (SERT condition). The remaining participants read aloud the 4 science texts (control condition). During this training phase, self-explanation, as compared to reading aloud, only improved comprehension for the most difficult of the 4 texts. Prior domain knowledge consistently improved comprehension performance, whereas reading skill and reading span had minimal effects. After training, both SERT and control participants self-explained a difficult text about cell mitosis. SERT improved comprehension and self-explanation quality only for participants with low domain knowledge. However, the effects of SERT on low-knowledge participants' comprehension emerged only for text-based questions and not for bridging- inference questions. Protocol analyses indicated that SERT helped these participants to use logic, or domain-general knowledge, rather than domain-specific knowledge to make sense of the text.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 30
页数:30
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]   SELF-EXPLANATIONS - HOW STUDENTS STUDY AND USE EXAMPLES IN LEARNING TO SOLVE PROBLEMS [J].
CHI, MTH ;
BASSOK, M ;
LEWIS, MW ;
REIMANN, P ;
GLASER, R .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1989, 13 (02) :145-182
[12]   ELICITING SELF-EXPLANATIONS IMPROVES UNDERSTANDING [J].
CHI, MTH ;
DELEEUW, N ;
CHIU, MH ;
LAVANCHER, C .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1994, 18 (03) :439-477
[13]   Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation [J].
Cote, N ;
Goldman, SR ;
Saul, EU .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1998, 25 (01) :1-53
[14]   Windows on comprehension: Reading comprehension processes as revealed by two think-aloud procedures [J].
Crain-Thoreson, C ;
Lippman, MZ ;
McClendon-Magnuson, D .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 89 (04) :579-591
[15]  
DAVEY B, 1983, J READING, V27, P44
[16]   EFFECTS OF INFERENCE TRAINING ON COMPREHENSION AND COMPREHENSION MONITORING [J].
DEWITZ, P ;
CARR, EM ;
PATBERG, JP .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1987, 22 (01) :99-121
[17]  
*ED COMM STAT, 1998, NAT ASS ED PROGR
[18]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND COMPREHENSION - A TEST OF 4 HYPOTHESES [J].
ENGLE, RW ;
CANTOR, J ;
CARULLO, JJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1992, 18 (05) :972-992
[19]   REFERENTIAL CONTINUITY AND THE COHERENCE OF DISCOURSE [J].
GARNHAM, A ;
OAKHILL, J ;
JOHNSONLAIRD, PN .
COGNITION, 1982, 11 (01) :29-46
[20]   CONSTRUCTING INFERENCES DURING NARRATIVE TEXT COMPREHENSION [J].
GRAESSER, AC ;
SINGER, M ;
TRABASSO, T .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1994, 101 (03) :371-395