Mercury emissions from selected stationary combustion sources in Korea

被引:35
作者
Lee, SJ
Seo, YC
Jurng, J
Hong, JH
Park, JW
Hyun, JE
Lee, TG [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Seoul 120749, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Wonju 220710, South Korea
[3] Korea Inst Sci & Technol, Air Resources Res Ctr, Seoul 136791, South Korea
[4] NIER, Air Pollut Engn Div, Inchon 404170, South Korea
关键词
mercury emission; combustion sources; mercury speciation; ontario hydro method;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.12.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mercury emissions from various stationary combustion sources such as coal-fired power plants, oil-fired power plants, industrial utility oil boilers, iron manufacturing plants, and industrial waste incinerators, were measured. The US EPA (Environmental protection agency) method 101A and the Ontario hydro method were used to sample the mercury containing combustion flue gases, at the inlet of the air pollution control devices (APCDs) and at the stack. Collected samples of both gaseous and particulate forms were then analyzed using CVAA (cold vapor atomic absorption) type analyzer. Measurement results from the coal-fired power plant showed percentages of elemental mercury (Hg-0) as high as 31.4% and as low as 9.5%. However, the content of Hg-0 was in the range of 1.3-3.7% from the industrial waste incinerator. Differences in mercury speciation from various stationary combustion sources are believed to be coming from: (1) difference in the fuel types; (2) difference in the major flue gas compositions (ex. HCl and SOx); and (3) difference in the types of air pollution control devices (APCDs). When the measurement results obtained using different sampling methods were compared, the Ontario Hydro Method gave a slightly higher mercury concentration measurement than that of the US EPA Method 101A. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 161
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EPA453R98004A
[2]   Mercury from combustion sources: A review of the chemical species emitted and their transport in the atmosphere [J].
Carpi, A .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1997, 98 (3-4) :241-254
[3]   Evaluation on speciation and removal efficiencies of mercury from municipal solid waste incinerators in Taiwan [J].
Chang, MB ;
Wu, HT ;
Huang, CK .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 246 (2-3) :165-173
[4]   The development of iodine based impinger solutions for the efficient capture of Hg0 using direct injection nebulization -: Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis [J].
Hedrick, E ;
Lee, TG ;
Biswas, P ;
Zhuang, Y .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (18) :3764-3773
[5]   Mercury control technologies for MWC's: The unanswered questions [J].
Krivanek, CS .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1996, 47 (1-3) :119-136
[6]   Mercury speciation methods for utility flue gas [J].
Laudal, D ;
Nott, B ;
Brown, T ;
Roberson, R .
FRESENIUS JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 358 (03) :397-400
[7]   Effects of flue gas constituents on mercury speciation [J].
Laudal, DL ;
Brown, TD ;
Nott, BR .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 65 :157-165
[8]   Flue gas effects on a carbon-based mercury sorbent [J].
Miller, SJ ;
Dunham, GE ;
Olson, ES ;
Brown, TD .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 65 :343-363
[9]  
Sjostrom S., 2001, MEG S AWMA SPEC C ME
[10]  
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997, EPA452R97010