The feasibility of neuropsychological endophenotypes in the search for genes associated with bipolar affective disorder

被引:195
作者
Glahn, DC
Bearden, CE
Niendam, TA
Escamilla, MA
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Psychiat, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychiat & Biobehav Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
bipolar disorder; cognitive endophenotype; genetic risk; neuropsychological;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00113.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Efforts to identify genetic loci for bipolar disorder (BPD) have thus far proved elusive. The identification of processes mediating between genotype and phenotype (endophenotypes) may help resolve the carrier status of family members in genetic studies of polygenetic disorders with imperfect penetrance, such as BPD. We reviewed the literature to determine if neuropsychological Measures could be used as effective endophenotypes to aid molecular genetic studies searching for genes predisposing to BPD. Methods: Four prerequisites for endophenotypic markers are described, and a critical review of relevant literature was undertaken to determine if neurocognitive measures satisfy these four requirements in BPD. Results: We found evidence that executive functions and declarative memory may be candidate neurocognitive endophenotypes for BPD. However, we cannot exclude other areas of cognition as being affected by BPD susceptibility genes, given the limits of the current knowledge of the neuropsychology of BPD. In particular, the paucity Of Studies measuring cognition in healthy relatives of BPD patient limits conclusion regarding familial aggregation of particular neurocognitive deficits (i.e. attention). Furthermore, the effects or clinical state and/or medication usage on cognitive functioning in BPD probands should be further explored. Conclusions: Molecular genetic studies of BPD may benefit from the application of select neuropsychological measures as endophenotypic markers. The use of these markers, once defined, may improve power for detecting genes predisposing to BPD and may help to better define diagnostic criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 182
页数:12
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]   Lithium lengthens the circadian period of individual suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons [J].
Abe, M ;
Herzog, ED ;
Block, GD .
NEUROREPORT, 2000, 11 (14) :3261-3264
[2]   Attentional vulnerability indicators in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder [J].
Addington, J ;
Addington, D .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1997, 23 (03) :197-204
[3]   Contrasts in neuropsychological test profile between patients with first-episode schizophrenia and first-episode affective disorders [J].
Albus, M ;
Hubmann, W ;
Wahlheim, C ;
Sobizack, N ;
Franz, U ;
Mohr, F .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 94 (02) :87-93
[4]  
Almasy L, 2001, AM J MED GENET, V105, P42, DOI 10.1002/1096-8628(20010108)105:1<42::AID-AJMG1055>3.3.CO
[5]  
2-0
[7]   Genetic structure of spatial and verbal working memory [J].
Ando, J ;
Ono, Y ;
Wright, MJ .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2001, 31 (06) :615-624
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Neuropsychological Assessment
[9]  
Atre-Vaidya N, 1998, NEUROPSY NEUROPSY BE, V11, P120
[10]   The neuropsychology and neuroanatomy of bipolar affective disorder: a critical review [J].
Bearden, CE ;
Hoffman, KM ;
Cannon, TD .
BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2001, 3 (03) :106-150