Self-Interest and Other-Orientation in Organizational Behavior: Implications for Job Performance, Prosocial Behavior, and Personal Initiative

被引:358
作者
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. [1 ]
Nauta, Aukje [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Randstad HR Solut, Diemen, Netherlands
关键词
self-interest; prosocial behavior; job performance; personal initiative; justice; SOCIAL VALUE ORIENTATION; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE; DECISION-MAKING; WORK; NEGOTIATION; ANTECEDENTS; CHOICE; VALUES; INTERDEPENDENCE; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
10.1037/a0014494
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In this article, the authors develop the self-concern and other-orientation as moderators hypothesis. The authors argue that many theories on work behavior assume humans to be either self-interested or to be social in nature with strong other-orientation but that this assumption is empirically invalid and may lead to overly narrow models of work behavior. The authors instead propose that self-concern and other-orientation are independent. The authors also propose that job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative are a function of (a) individual-level attributes, such as job characteristics when employees are high in self-concern, and (b) group-level attributes, such as justice climate when employees are high in other-orientation. Three studies involving 4 samples of employees from a variety of organizations support these propositions. Implications are discussed for theory oil work behavior and interventions geared toward job enrichment and team-based working.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 926
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Batson C. D., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, P282, DOI DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI0519
[2]  
Blake R.R., 1964, The managerial grid
[3]  
Borman W.C., 1993, Personnel selection in organizations, P71, DOI DOI 10.1007/SPRINGERREFERENCE_7472
[4]   CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS - EFFECTS OF SOCIAL IDENTITY, GROUP-SIZE, AND DECISION FRAMING [J].
BREWER, MB ;
KRAMER, RM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 50 (03) :543-549
[5]  
Camac C., 1992, SOCIAL DILEMMAS, P147
[6]   TOWARD A SYSTEMS THEORY OF MOTIVATED BEHAVIOR IN WORK TEAMS [J].
Chen, Gilad ;
Kanfer, Ruth .
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 27, 2006, 27 :223-267
[7]   Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate [J].
Colquitt, JA ;
Noe, RA ;
Jackson, CL .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (01) :83-109
[8]   Self-interest: defining and understanding a human motive [J].
Cropanzano, R ;
Goldman, B ;
Folger, R .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2005, 26 (08) :985-991
[9]   MEASURING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN EMPATHY - EVIDENCE FOR A MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH [J].
DAVIS, MH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 44 (01) :113-126
[10]   Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making [J].
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. ;
Nijstad, Bernard A. ;
van Knippenberg, Daan .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 12 (01) :22-49