Characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic patients with and without excessive esophageal acid exposure

被引:62
作者
Bredenoord, Albert J.
Weusten, Bas L. A. M.
Timmer, Robin
Smout, Andre J. P. M.
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, NL-3430 EM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Res Unit, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00945.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: In some patients with a physiological esophageal acid exposure, an association between reflux episodes and symptoms can be demonstrated. Besides acidity, other factors such as proximal extent may determine whether a reflux episode is perceived or not. We aimed to investigate the reflux profile of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with physiological acid exposure. METHODS: Twenty-four-hour impedance-pH monitoring was performed in 14 GERD patients with excessive acid exposure (pH+), 14 GERD patients with physiological acid exposure (pH-), and 14 controls. All patients had a positive symptom-reflux association during 24-h monitoring (SAP+). RESULTS: The incidence of acid reflux episodes in pH- SAP+ patients (25.5 +/- 4.9) and controls (20.2 +/- 3.9) was comparable, but lower than in pH+ SAP+ patients (69.8 +/- 7.3). However, no differences in number of weakly acidic reflux episodes were observed among pH- SAP+ patients, pH+ SAP+ patients, and controls (27.2 +/- 3.8 vs 26.8 +/- 4.6 and 21.0 +/- 3.7, respectively). The proportion of reflux episodes that reached the proximal esophagus was significantly higher in the pH+ SAP+ (33.5%) and pH- SAP+ (36.0%) patients than in the controls (19.5%). Volume clearance time was longer in pH+ SAP+ (12.5 [12.5-17.0] s) compared with pH- SAP+ patients (12.0 [11.0-16.5] s) and controls (9.5 [10.0-12.5] s) (P < 0.05). Acid clearance time was also longer in pH+ SAP+ patients (55.0 [32.0-64.0] s) compared with the pH- SAP+ (16.5 [11.4-40.0] s) and controls (14 [12.0-19.1] s) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In pH- SAP+ patients, a higher proportion of reflux episodes reach the proximal esophagus than in controls. This can in part explain their symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:2470 / 2475
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, J GASTROINTEST MOTIL, V3, P151, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2982.1991.TB00061.X
[2]   Determinants of perception of heartburn and regurgitation [J].
Bredenoord, AJ ;
Weusten, BLAM ;
Curvers, WL ;
Timmer, R ;
Smout, AJPM .
GUT, 2006, 55 (03) :313-318
[3]   Reproducibility of multichannel intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring of gastroesophageal reflux [J].
Bredenoord, AJ ;
Weusten, BLAM ;
Timmer, R ;
Smout, AJPM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (02) :265-269
[4]   Minimum sample frequency for multichannel intraluminal impedance measurement of the oesophagus [J].
Bredenoord, AJ ;
Weusten, BLAM ;
Timmer, R ;
Smout, AJPM .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2004, 16 (06) :713-719
[5]   Effect of endoscopic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (Gatekeeper reflux repair system) on intraoesophageal dynamic characteristics of acid reflux [J].
Cicala, M ;
Gabbrielli, A ;
Emerenziani, S ;
Guarino, MPL ;
Ribolsi, M ;
Caviglia, R ;
Costamagna, G .
GUT, 2005, 54 (02) :183-186
[6]   Intra-oesophageal distribution and perception of acid reflux in patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease [J].
Cicala, M ;
Emerenziani, S ;
Caviglia, R ;
Guarino, MPL ;
Vavassori, P ;
Ribolsi, M ;
Carotti, S ;
Pettiti, T ;
Pallone, F .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 18 (06) :605-613
[7]  
Clouse R. E., 1999, Gut, V45, pII31
[8]  
Diaz S, 2002, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V122, pA75
[9]   Gastric fullness, physical activity, and proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux [J].
Emerenziani, S ;
Zhang, X ;
Blondeau, K ;
Silny, J ;
Tack, J ;
Janssens, J ;
Sifrim, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (06) :1251-1256
[10]   Functional esophageal disorders [J].
Galmiche, Jean Paul ;
Clouse, Ray E. ;
Balint, Andras ;
Cook, Ian J. ;
Kahrilas, Peter J. ;
Paterson, William G. ;
Smout, Andre J. P. M. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 130 (05) :1459-1465