Comments to Orri Stefansson's Paper on the Precautionary Principle

被引:7
作者
Aven, Terje [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
UNCERTAINTIES;
D O I
10.1111/risa.13270
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:1223 / 1224
页数:2
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Aven T., 2019, RELIABILITY EN UNPUB
[2]   Straightening Out the Grounds for Precaution: A Commentary and Some Suggestions About Terje Aven's "On Different Types of Uncertainties" Response [J].
Aven, Terje .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2011, 31 (10) :1538-1542
[3]   On Different Types of Uncertainties in the Context of the Precautionary Principle [J].
Aven, Terje .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2011, 31 (10) :1515-1525
[4]   The Precautionary Principle Has Not Been Shown to Be Incoherent: A Reply to Peterson [J].
Boyer-Kassem, Thomas .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (11) :2039-2040
[5]   Is the Precautionary Principle Really Incoherent? [J].
Boyer-Kassem, Thomas .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (11) :2026-2034
[6]   Should the precautionary principle guide our actions or our beliefs? [J].
Peterson, M. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2007, 33 (01) :5-10
[7]  
Peterson M., 2017, The ethics of technology: A geometric analysis of five moral principles
[8]   The precautionary principle is incoherent [J].
Peterson, Martin .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2006, 26 (03) :595-601
[9]   Yes, The Precautionary Principle Is Incoherent [J].
Peterson, Martin .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (11) :2035-2038
[10]   On the Limits of the Precautionary Principle [J].
Stefansson, H. Orri .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2019, 39 (06) :1204-1222