Normal vertebral body dimensions: A new measurement method using MRI

被引:14
作者
Cyteval, C
Thomas, E
Picot, MC
Derieffy, P
Blotman, F
Taourel, P
机构
[1] Hop Lapeyronie, Dept Radiol, Montpellier 5, France
[2] Hop Lapeyronie, Dept Rheumatol, Montpellier 5, France
[3] Hop Arnaud Villeneuve, Dept Stat, Montpellier, France
[4] CIRAD, Dept AMIS, Montpellier, France
关键词
area; MRI; normal vertebral body; volume;
D O I
10.1007/s001980200056
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Much clinical research on osteoporosis is aimed at documenting a reduction in vertebral fracture rates, but there is considerable disagreement about defining normality. Most methods for measuring vertebral body dimensions use lateral radiographs. In the present paper, we investigate the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for normal reference determination. A validation study was performed on a cadaver by comparing vertebral body volume measured both with MRI (sagittal acquisition in T1 weighted sequence) and with immersion. MRI was then performed with the same protocol from T4 to L5 in a standard population of 80 women with no history of vertebral fractures. Then all vertebral measurements were standardized relative to each other, and means and standard deviations were calculated using a statistical fitting procedure derived from volume and medial area. The validation study confirmed the reproducibility and accuracy of MRI (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.95). There was a strong correlation between volume and medial area of vertebral bodies (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.95) and a constant relationship between the medial area of vertebral bodies for each subject (coefficient of variation 5.6%). The variations in vertebral body dimensions will allow comparison with pathologic vertebral fractures in further studies. This could be useful for monitoring osteoporosis treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 473
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow:: Differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures [J].
Baur, A ;
Stäbler, A ;
Brüning, R ;
Bartl, R ;
Krödel, A ;
Reiser, M ;
Deimling, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (02) :349-356
[2]
BLACK DM, 1991, J BONE MINER RES, V6, P883
[3]
DAVIES KM, 1989, J BONE MINER RES, P4341
[4]
EASTELL R, 1991, J BONE MINER RES, V6, P207
[5]
In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging [J].
Eckstein, F ;
Westhoff, J ;
Sittek, H ;
Maag, KP ;
Haubner, M ;
Faber, S ;
Englmeier, KH ;
Reiser, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (03) :593-597
[6]
Fisher RA, 1958, STAT METHODS RES WOR
[7]
GALLAGHER JC, 1988, BONE MINER, V4, P189
[8]
VERTEBRAL FRACTURE ASSESSMENT USING A SEMIQUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUE [J].
GENANT, HK ;
WU, CY ;
VANKUIJK, C ;
NEVITT, MC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1993, 8 (09) :1137-1148
[9]
CHANGE IN VERTEBRAL SHAPE IN SPINAL OSTEOPOROSIS [J].
HEDLUND, LR ;
GALLAGHER, JC ;
MEEGER, C ;
STONER, S .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 44 (03) :168-172
[10]
Brain tumor volume measurement: Comparison of manual and semiautomated methods [J].
Joe, BN ;
Fukui, MB ;
Meltzer, CC ;
Huang, QS ;
Day, RS ;
Greer, PJ ;
Bozik, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 212 (03) :811-816